Lawyer Barred Over Lost Briefcase Launches High Court Appeal
The junior UK solicitor has since set up a crowdfunding campaign after being ordered to pay £10,000 in costs after leaving sensitive documents on a train.
April 23, 2020 at 09:59 AM
3 minute read
A junior solicitor who lost her license to practice law after losing a briefcase containing Solicitors Regulation Authority documents has launched a last-minute U.K. high court appeal against her conviction.
Claire Matthews, formerly of Capsticks, was barred from the industry and ordered to pay £10,000 in costs after losing the documents that related to a case by the firm's client, the SRA. She is appealing the her conviction, aided by pro bono representation from Leigh Day and barristers at Deans Court Chambers.
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found she attempted to cover-up the loss of the briefcase in a bid to give her time to try and find it, which proved unsuccessful.
In her mitigation at the SDT, Matthews, who had no legal counsel and represented herself, stated that her actions were a result of being "panic-stricken" with the dread of informing Capsticks as to what had happened, particularly as she had only been with the firm a matter of weeks.
In addition, Matthews cited suffering from mental health problems including anxiety and depression, accoridng to the tribunal documents.
As well as launching an appeal, Matthews has also started a crowdfunding campaign on GoFundMe, aimed at covering potential legal costs of the appeal as well as costs ordered by the SDT following the conviction.
As of Thursday, the campaign had been live for 24 hours and had garnered over £4,500 from nearly 200 donors from the industry and beyond.
According to a statement by Leigh Day, the firm is representing Matthews in her appeal on a pro bono basis, with the firm's team being led by Gideon Habel, partner and head of the firm's regulatory and disciplinary practice.
The firm has also instructed Mary O'Rourke QC and Rosalind Scott Bell of Deans Court Chambers. According to O'Rourke, the case raises issues surrounding lack of representation in tribunal hearings, as well as potential conflicts of interest resulting from the SRA being both a client and the prosecutor.
O'Rourke also added: "There's issues with costs anyway, but it's even more wrong if you're striking them off, you've blocked access to their job and livelihood. They've taken away her livelihood – she's 31 years old."
Since her dismissal and subsequent debarment, Matthews has taken up work at an NHS 111 call centre according to her crowdfunding page. She has stated that if she is successful, all funding will be donated to legal mental health chairty, LawCare.
The SRA delcined to comment on ongoing issues.
|Read More:
SRA Mulling Next Steps on Dechert Partner Neil Gerrard Claims
Is The SRA Regulating Your Private Life?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoctors and Scientists Lead Climate Protests at Each Magic Circle Firm
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250