Mishcon, Pinsents Float Reduced Week for Lawyers as CMS, HSF Take Action In Spain
CMS has cut staff in its Madrid office, while HSF has rolled out a reduced working week in the city.
April 24, 2020 at 07:42 AM
3 minute read
Pinsent Masons and Mishcon de Reya have taken further steps to offset the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic, while two international firms have enacted cost-cutting measures in their Spanish offices.
According to Mishcon De Reya managing partner James Libson, the firm has announced that should the market conditions worsen, staff will be asked to sign up for reduced hours and pay which could seem them working 3.5 day working weeks.
Pinsents has confirmed that discussions are currently underway regarding the potential for a similar reduced working week with a pro rata reduction in pay.
Both firms had previously announced changes to partner pay.
Meanwhile in Spain, CMS and Herbert Smith Freehills have taken steps to limit the financial impact of the crisis.
11 staff have been cut from the Madrid office of CMS Albiñana & Suárez de Lezo. Those affected include six associates and two secretaries who are being made redundant, and three interns who the firm says will be rehired in October.
The firm said it continues to hire in areas where activity levels are strong including employment, litigation, IP and on its German desk.
Meanwhile at HSF, all fee-earners and business services staff in its Madrid office will start working a four-day week with a 20% pay cut from May 1, the firm confirmed in a statement.
The new measure will last for an initial six months, and the firm added that it will review its position again.
Earlier on Friday, CMS announced that it would be deferring all partner distributions from July until later in the year.
Earlier this month, HSF said it will reduce its partner profit distributions and also slow the pace of when they are paid out to partners from May on. The firm has also frozen salaries and pushed back pay reviews until October.
Mishcon previously announced it would reduce partner drawings by between 15 and 50%, and freezing partner profit distributions. Libson added that it was the firm's policy that "partners bear the lion's share of any cuts we deem appropriate to protect our business."
In addition, the firm confirmed it had furloughed some staff who are unable to do their job in the current environment, as well as those in areas of the firm where work has reduced because of the crisis.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250