Dentons Australia Cuts Staff and Partner Pay
Staff salaries are reduced by 20% while partner pay is cut by half for all Australian offices.
April 27, 2020 at 07:57 AM
2 minute read
Dentons has cut Australia staff pay by 20% and partner pay by half to preserve as many jobs as possible in the COVID-19 crisis, it has announced.
For May and June, all 449 staff across Dentons' Australian offices and patent attorney office in New Zealand will have their pay cut by a fifth; some are required to continue working full-time hours and to take a small number of leave days per month, while others will work reduced hours, Dentons' Australian arm said in a statement.
Meanwhile all 70 equity partners in these offices have reduced both their monthly take home pay and frozen all profit distributions, which equates to in excess of a 50% reduction in cash flow, the firm said.
"We have taken a conservative look at our profit forecast for the coming months, and we believe the approach we have asked our employees to agree to will ensure we can preserve as many jobs as possible, and come out in a strong position on the other side," Dentons Australia chair and Australasia region CEO, Doug Stipanicev, said in a statement.
"Our agile business allows us to redeploy some of our employees to areas that are seeing an increase in work, but we also have a responsibility to do everything we can to preserve the jobs of our people," he added.
Stipanicev said while the firm was in a "strong position" to weather the COVID-19 storm, no one can predict how long this will go on for, or what the overall impact will be.
Dentons is the latest among law firms and practices in Australia to cut staff pay. Others including Norton Rose Fulbright and MinterEllison as well as accounting firms EY and PwC all announced measures to reduce staff salaries and partner drawdowns.
Related Stories:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Greenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute read- Working Remotely 'Sped Up' Vaccine Work: Lawyers Involved Tell Their Story
- 'COVID-19 Has Put Mental Health On Everyone's Agenda': The Former Lawyer Turned Corporate Wellbeing Trainer
- Big Four Legal Arm Head Says COVID-19 Will Change the Way Law is Practiced
- The COVID-19 Lockdown Is a Game Changer for Women in Law
- French Law Firms Prepare for a 'Soft Opening' After COVID-19 Lockdown
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250