Reinventing Your Law Firm: If Not Now, When?
As the demand for legal services lessens, supply will increase, leaving lawyers and law firms that lack strong positioning and differentiation struggling to overcome perceptions that they're offering nothing more than a commodity.
April 30, 2020 at 10:55 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
During the last decade, countless predictions were made about the coming age of innovation in the legal industry, but there was only marginal, incremental change. As Danish physicist Neil Bohrs once said, "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future."
Something no one predicted is that it would take a global pandemic to finally usher in an era of actual innovation—that is, implementing change, not merely talking about it. Law firms have been forced to change more in the past six weeks than in the previous 10 years combined. Innovation has always been one of those loose, difficult-to-define words, but now we're getting a taste of what it really means. Nothing awakens necessity more than a crisis.
Law firms are now beginning to look beyond the urgency and immediacy of the onset of this crisis, and trying to assess what comes next. It seems all but certain that any hope of a "V-shaped" recovery, ushering in a swift return to the "old normal," is wishful thinking. We are moving past the beginning but are nowhere near the end. We are in a liminal space, which is a transitional time between what was and what is next.
Author Richard Rohr describes a liminal space (the word "liminal" is derived from the Latin word "limen," meaning threshold) as: "Where we are betwixt and between the familiar and the completely unknown. There alone is our old world left behind, while we are not yet sure of the new existence. That's a good space where genuine newness can begin."
Law firms have a choice. One option is to wait it out—taking small, middling measures—until things go back to the old way. Another, which recognizes we are at the threshold to a future that will look nothing like the past, is to lean into the current crisis and invent a new way of doing business that adapts to and addresses the evolving needs of the marketplace.
This liminal moment is a time for focused strategy and rapid execution. One of the unexpected consequences of the current crisis is that some of the winners that emerge on the other side will be those who are feeling the pain most acutely at this moment. A crisis is a forcing function. Many of those who have strong financial means may simply hunker down. Those who are struggling, for whom the status quo is intolerable, will be forced to invent and innovate.
While predicting the future is impossible, it is incumbent upon law firm leaders to do their best to forecast what is coming next. Many practical changes have been made to adapt to near-term circumstances. What's being missed is that many cultural changes, which will significantly impact market dynamics moving forward, are likely irreversible. From how and where people work, to changes in client buying behaviors, there is no going back to the pre-COVID-19 status quo.
While the "punch list" of issues that law firm leaders must address right now is a mile long, there are certain important, fundamental themes that future-focused leaders should be considering while making decisions. Keep in mind that—and this is important—these themes relate to existing trends that are being deepened and accelerated by the pandemic, not necessarily created by it. Therefore, failure to adapt in hopes of returning to the status quo will result in a step back, not merely standing still.
Remote Work: In short, it's working—at least well enough that firms should be considering making what was seen as a temporary arrangement a more permanent one. As many firms that previously dispersed their workforces have already come to realize, lawyers are capable or serving their clients from home offices, and clients are more or less agnostic as to where work is being done as long as it's getting done at a satisfactory level of quality. Just as more health care will be administered virtually via telehealth moving forward, more legal work will be conducted via "telelaw."
Does that mean there will be universal conversion from on-site to virtual in the legal industry? Of course not. But virtual, or at least virtual-ish, will become a more prominent working model for many law firms due to financial considerations, workforce preferences, and client indifference as to whether a lawyer is working from her office or her kitchen table. Firms that rigidly intend to return to co-located work should re-examine their beliefs about the necessity and benefits of having everyone working under one roof. After all, even though remote is not perfect, your firm and your lawyers will only get better at it with more practice.
Real Estate: One of the major implications of a shift to virtual work will be a reassessment of the investment in real estate—from owned buildings to leased office space—that many firms allocate large amounts of their annual budgets toward. Firms, especially in big cities, tend to opt for "Class A" office space at top-of-market rates, and often lease or buy more space than they need to accommodate for expected growth. Their fixed real estate costs hamper their ability to invest in innovative solutions that can grow their business. In the future, firms may decide that an office is better recast as a place to meet clients and host critical infrastructure operations, while lawyers operate independent of any spatial constraints.
Systems and Processes: Many law firms operate as an eclectic group of practices and individuals, each with its own idea of the best way to serve clients, manage projects and develop new business. They're loosely bound together under the banner of a law firm's brand, but lack systems and processes that result in consistent work product and predictable client experiences. It's long been said that law firms need to run more like entrepreneurial enterprises, with dialed-in strategies, systems and processes that dictate how work gets done, but that call to action has largely been ignored.
As you contemplate how your firm can be best positioned to emerge stronger from the crisis, consider how the lack of systems and processes hamper the optimal performance of various functions within your firm. How can your teams communicate better? Do you lack consistent efforts in marketing and business development? Is timekeeping being captured? Are collections lagging? Are you improving your talent through professional development training? Too often, these and other issues are dealt with, if at all, with an ad hoc approach instead of a strategic one based on clear, consistent systems and processes that ensure accountability.
Hollywood Model: In terms of trends deepening and accelerating due to the COVID-19 crisis, one that is almost certain to pick up pace is corporate clients looking for the right expert for a particular job, rather than relying on one law firm as a one-stop shop. Sophisticated clients are increasingly viewing the delivery of legal services as part of a supply chain, and plugging in the right resources at each tier to satisfy their demand for specialized expertise. No longer is a lawyer (or a law firm) being relied upon to handle all aspects of legal matters. What used to be the job of a lawyer is now seen as a series of discrete tasks—many of which can be handled by alternative legal service providers and/or software algorithms.
To adapt, law firms need to accelerate their adaptation toward more nimble, flexible work arrangements, such as the so-called "Hollywood model." In Hollywood productions, a producer assembles a team to work on a project and the team works together for as long as is necessary to complete the project. The Hollywood model allows organizations to scale up or down to meet demand. For law firms, this means relying less on fully-staffed, fixed-cost teams, and instead assembling teams based on the specific needs of a project. To accomplish this, firms will need to embrace more of a Hollywood model approach, maintaining a solid core while bringing in experts on a temporary basis to perform discrete functions, rather than being fully staffed for every eventuality.
|If Not Now, When?
There are other themes that will deepen and accelerate trends in the legal marketplace. As the economy continues to weaken, there will be churn in corporate legal departments, leading to fractured relationships and opportunities for non-incumbents. As the demand for legal services lessens, supply will increase, leaving lawyers and law firms that lack strong positioning and differentiation struggling to overcome perceptions that they're offering nothing more than a commodity. The number of innovations that can be hatched to address these and other developments is limited only by a law firm's dedication to strategic thinking.
The task ahead feels immense. But as with any difficult task, the only way to approach it is one step at a time. After all, if not now, when?
Jay Harrington is a lawyer, author, business coach and consultant to leading lawyers and law firms. He is the president of Harrington Communications, a top thought-leadership marketing agency serving a nationwide clientele of law firms. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Locks In Its American Dream. But What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250