Australian Privacy Lawyers Pen Letter in Support of Coronavirus Tracing App
The lawyers who signed the letter come from global firms Bird & Bird, DLA Piper, Herbert Smith Freehills, K&L Gates, King & Wood Mallesons and Norton Rose Fulbright, as well as from several top-tier Australian firms and corporations.
May 06, 2020 at 08:16 PM
7 minute read
Nick Abrahams, a Norton Rose Fulbright partner who specializes in technology and privacy law, and 47 other privacy law specialists from Australian and international law firms, signed an open letter announcing they have all downloaded a government-sponsored COVID-19 tracing app and fully support it.
The app, dubbed COVIDSafe, is designed to speed trace people who have come into contact with a person with the coronavirus and is one of the measures put in place by Australia Prime Minister Scott Morrison as the government prepares to reopen the country.
"I think that everyone had to make a decision around this app and ask, 'do the health and economic benefits outweigh the privacy risks,'" said Abrahams, co-author of the book "Big Data, Big Responsibilities: A Guide to Privacy and Data Security for Australian Business" and global head of technology and innovation at Norton Rose.
"So for me, I made a decision early on they would, subject to seeing more detail on the privacy issues. And then once we got more detail, I became more convinced that this was important."
The app launched April 26, and 10 days later, on May 6, it had been voluntarily downloaded by more than 5.1 million people. This far exceeded the government's expectations but still falls short of the 10 million target.
Abrahams decided to gather colleagues together to write the open letter after he saw comments on social media from people declaring they wouldn't let the government spy on them and that it was the "thin end of the wedge."
Concerns about potential privacy and security breaches surrounding the app are not just coming from social media.
Richard Buckland, a professor of cybersecurity at the University of New South Wales, has been quoted saying it is "almost inevitable" that the app will be hacked and that no one knows how a government of the future might use this new information.
Australian epidemiologist Mary-Louise McLaws, who sits on a World Health Organization panel that advises on the preparedness, readiness and response to coronaviruses, has said there needs to be more community consultation about the app and she wouldn't recommend anyone download it.
But in many parts of the world, including established democracies, privacy concerns have been outweighed by the desire to quash the spread of the coronavirus. South Korea has successfully deployed tracing apps that go further in impinging privacy than the app deployed in Australia. The Korean app uses a combination of phone location data, CCTV footage and electronic financial data to track confirmed coronavirus cases, and that information is made public.
Singapore introduced an app similar to Australia's at the start of April but concerns that it doesn't work unless it is open on a phone user's screen have limited usage to about 20%.
In Europe, coronavirus tracing apps are being adopted in Italy, Germany and Austria, but the European Union has called for strict rules to ensure privacy. In France, meanwhile, a country where personal freedom and privacy are highly prized, the government's StopCovid app is expected to be made available to the public at the start of June.
In the U.S., there is not yet any countrywide effort to deploy a national contact tracing system.
The open letter from the Australian privacy lawyers is short and to the point. It says:
"The people listed below are all Australian lawyers with significant experience in the field of privacy law. They have all downloaded the COVIDSafe App and consented to their name being made public via this letter."
A second sentence states that each signatory is participating in their personal capacity and the views don't necessarily reflect the views of their firm or employer.
"We specifically didn't go down the route of a detailed letter in support of the app and why, because being lawyers, we would have loaded it with caveats and assumptions and so forth," Abrahams said.
Signatories include lawyers from global firms Bird & Bird, DLA Piper, Norton Rose Fulbright, Herbert Smith Freehills, K&L Gates, and King & Wood Mallesons, as well as from domestic firms including Allens, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Gadens, and Gilbert + Tobin. In-house counsel from insurers IAG and QBE Insurance have also signed.
While the lawyers have downloaded the app, some said they still have privacy concerns.
"If I look at the societal benefit of me downloading the app, that outweighs any loss of privacy that I will suffer," said Abrahams.
Cameron Abbott, K&L Gates' co-practice area leader for corporate, takes a similar view and acknowledges it will lead to some loss of privacy.
"It impacts an important civil liberty and one that I certainly value and spent a lot of my working life advising in relation to. It had an impact, but it's just clearly outweighed by the greater community good in terms of health and the economy," he said.
The government's responses to the coronavirus have already restricted some civil liberties in Australia, such as barring people from leaving their homes unless they meet certain criteria. Abbott said the tracing app might help restore those rights.
High among the privacy issues is concern that the app will enable law enforcement agencies to access the data. The government has denied this.
In addition, the data is only downloaded from an individual's phone if they have tested positive for COVID-19, in which case it is stored in the Amazon Web Services Cloud. This has given rise to another fear—that the U.S. government could use the CLOUD Act to subpoena information collected by the COVIDSafe app. Under the CLOUD Act, U.S. cloud services can be required to produce data held by them regardless of where in the world that data is stored.
The government has said the COVIDSafe laws will supersede the CLOUD Act.
Abbott said he welcomes debate about the safety of the app but chooses not to dwell on the specifics. "I am aware of most of those things and I made the personal decision that I made because even in light of that, I don't want to lose the perspective on what we're trying to achieve, which is the fundamental health outcome and a fundamental economic outcome," he said.
"I keep coming back to the range of civil liberties that are massively curtailed at the current time in order to try and achieve those health outcomes, and this is another one. It is seriously material, but it would appear to be for the greater good."
|How the COVIDSafe App Works
Users download the app to their smartphone then provide their name, mobile number, postal code and age range.
COVIDSafe uses Bluetooth to recognize other devices with the COVIDSafe app installed. When the app recognizes another user, it notes the date, time, distance and duration of the contact and the other user's reference code, but not their name. It does not collect the user's location.
The information about other users is encrypted and that encrypted identifier is stored on the user's smartphone and is deleted 21 days after it has been collected to take account of the incubation period for COVID-19.
When someone with the COVIDSafe app is diagnosed with COVID-19, health officials ask for their permission to access the encrypted contact information from the app and upload it to a database. They unlock the encrypted information using a "key" and access their contact details.
They then use the information collected by the app to support their usual manual contact tracing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Six Korean Firm Bae, Kim & Lee Boosts Disputes Offering With Former A&O Lifer
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose, Greenberg Traurig, White & Case Lead Major Deals in Asia
Aviation Attorney and Pilot Analyzes Jeju Air Crash, Potential Litigation Issues
Shoosmiths Hires Two Locke Lord London Partners as Part of a Six-Strong IP Team
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 2Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 3Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 4Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 5To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250