Returning to Work Post-Lockdown: Lessons From Asia
The Singapore head of a law firm has views on what the UK can learn from Asia's challenges.
May 06, 2020 at 05:10 AM
6 minute read
|
As the U.K.'s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme went live, public debate shifted to when and how the lockdown could be eased. So far, the government has been keeping its counsel on this point – so employers are naturally looking to other countries further ahead of the curve for a clue about what's to come. The pandemic's initial origination in Asia provides an opportunity for western-based employers to preview what a return to work might look like.
Prepare for additional waves
A secondary spread of the virus seems almost certain, with the U.K. government modifying its criteria for easing the lockdown to add a tacit acceptance of this inevitability. Singapore provides an important case study. Singapore's first wave of the virus arose out of the significant travel to and from China around the Chinese New Year.
Quick action largely succeeded in limiting the initial spread, but a second wave came as individuals returned to Singapore from Europe and the United States. Then, in spite of government intervention, a third wave flooded the city, seeing close to 1,000 or more new cases each day for weeks as the virus spread through high occupancy workers' dormitories.
Employers considering a return to work must therefore plan for the likelihood of additional waves of the virus. This means ensuring your business continuity plans are up to date, incorporate recent events, and are sufficiently adapted to address potential future lockdowns, aggressive social distancing, and/or other tactics.
Moreover, a return to work in phases will also help to hedge some of the risks associated with immediate increases in the virus. Employers should also communicate to employees the possibility of future furloughs or other modifications to the employment relationship, and consider establishing a contractual right to do so.
Companies are installing foot-operated doors, placing Plexiglas between work-stations, staggering start times, and taking other steps to reduce the possible spread of contagion.
Also, social distancing is here to stay – at least for a while. In Asia, companies have been creative in addressing and adapting social distancing principles to their own workplace.
In China, one manufacturer is requiring employees to eat in designated spots, to face the same direction when eating, and to use separate tables from one another. Some Korean employers prohibit eating lunch across from one another and maintain video conferencing to reduce face-to-face interactions.
Other companies are installing foot-operated doors, placing Plexiglas between work-stations, staggering start times, and taking other steps to reduce the possible spread of contagion. Whatever the approach taken, it should be tailored to the company's worksite risks and incorporate any lingering local legislation.
Is WFH here to stay?
Given the numerous lockdowns, global employers were forced to adopt working from home strategies (where possible) to maintain business continuity. Companies grappled with the practical administration of such a program, including ensuring appropriate access, equipment, and security. They also had a crash-course on legal compliance issues, such as with disparate rules for reimbursement of home office expenses across jurisdictions.
A cautious and staged approach to re-opening the worksite has the advantage of allowing employers to test social distancing strategies in advance of full staffing to ensure their compatibility and effectiveness.
Ultimately, it is still too early to tell, even in Asia, the long-term impact of the new familiarity with remote working. It seems safe to say that working from home is likely to remain an ongoing option for many months to come.
Even when restrictions were lifted, employers in China have been reluctant (or unable) to re-open at 100% and many employees were reluctant to return. A cautious and staged approach to re-opening the worksite has the advantage of allowing employers to test social distancing strategies in advance of full staffing to ensure their compatibility and effectiveness.
On the other hand, further extending work-from-home serves to further entrench workers in a newfound familiarity with (or perhaps even preferences for) that convenience. Any U.K. employers who have thus far resisted permitting working from home may find it difficult to put this genie back in the bottle.
In the medium term, we anticipate an increase in flexible working applications as tens of thousands of employees experience the flexibility that only a portion of the workforce previously enjoyed. Employers may find it difficult to resist these applications on grounds of practicality if business continuity has been successfully maintained for weeks already.
The return to work will continue to require employers to manage ahead for reduced cash-flow, supply chain impediments, diminished business opportunities, and other risks.
Watch the bottom line
The economic impact of COVID-19 is uncertain and some industries have seen extensive impact while others have not. That pattern is likely to continue through the recovery, particularly as later waves have an unpredictable effect.
In any case, the return to work will continue to require employers to manage ahead for reduced cash-flow, supply chain impediments, diminished business opportunities, and other risks. In Asia, as in the West, employers are and continue to assess and revise compensation structures, headcount, and benefits. Making these changes rapidly and in response to international challenges will keep HR and other people professionals busy for some months to come.
Asia's experience with the virus has provided some helpful tips for what many western companies may see as they now begin to emerge from government-enforced lockdowns. But, the process has only just begun, and U.K. employers should continue to look to international experiences for insight into how to face these novel issues.
Trent Sutton is the office managing shareholder of Littler's Singapore office. Raoul Parekh is a partner with employment law firm GQ|Littler in London.
|
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250