Baker McKenzie Surveys Staff Over London Office Return As DLA Also Mulls Reopening Base
Baker McKenzie has surveyed all its London people about a return to the office. One of its task force members in charge of the situation said that it had raised "quite a big ethical question."
May 07, 2020 at 05:16 AM
5 minute read
Baker McKenzie and DLA Piper are preparing for the possible return of their staff to U.K. offices, with both firms appointing task-forces to manage the process.
Baker McKenzie sent a survey to its entire London workforce on Monday to gather information and opinions on a potential return to the base, which closed on March 18 due to the current COVID-19 pandemic.
It asks people about their roles, where they currently sit in the office, and whether they take public transport when travelling to the base at 100 New Bridge St.
The survey also asks how people feel about coming back to the office and what the biggest challenges would be for them if they wish to stay working at home, or travel into the base.
The firm had set up a crisis team to handle the matter, which includes dispute resolution partner Joanna Ludlam, London managing partner Alex Chadwick and the firm's head of facilities.
Ludlam said the question of returning to the office is "emotional" as well as a "practical", and stressed the importance of diversity of thought when it comes to the situation.
She added: "We had heard anecdotally that there was a real range of views on this issue. This includes people who couldn't really contemplate spending any more time in the situation they have been in for weeks – for example, those living alone or in a flat-share, or people who live in places where broadband isn't reliable; or people on the other end of the spectrum who cannot comprehend coming back to the office because they are home-schooling or have other commitments."
Employees were also asked in the survey what they thought management should consider as they consider re-opening the office, and asked for people to contribute ideas on how the process could be handled.
A Baker McKenzie London partner said: "I think it's really important to ask the people that will be affected what they think. It will be hard to decide what to do about this because so many people will have different opinions on it."
The firm has asked staff to contribute to the process ahead of an address by U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Sunday. The PM said on Wednesday that he would give a statement on Sunday about plans to ease the lockdown.
Meanwhile, DLA Piper has also been planning for a return to the firm's U.K. offices, as part of a global working group's analysis as to whether U.K. staff could be back in the workplace by early June.
The firm has bases in London, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield, with management aiming to get a limited number of employees back in the office on a staggered basis. A spokesperson for the firm said that any return to the office would depend on the U.K. government's guidance.
Baker McKenzie's Ludlam said consideration of re-opening of its London operations raises "quite a big ethical question" about whether it is something the firm should be proactively doing, given the success its people have had working from home "without really any big challenges."
"Given that is the case, there is an overarching issue about whether we should be contributing to society by restricting the circulation of our people on public transport. We haven't reached any views on that just yet, but what is at the forefront of our minds is to make sure that we are contributing to efforts in keeping the virus under control," she explained.
The survey was sent out to all London lawyers and staff on Monday morning and is expected to close at the end of the day on Wednesday. Ludlam said that more than half of the office had already sent over their responses by Monday afternoon.
She added that the health and well-being of staff remains at the forefront of any decisions to re-open the office, and notes that the process for re-opening the London office after such an extensive closure will be more challenging than it was to initially shut it down.
The firm will take a "close look" at the government's guidance set to be issued on Sunday, Ludlam added, to see how realistic a return to the office would be, but says that they "have to be careful not to make too hasty a decision about things".
Read more
Welcome to the Law Firm Office of the Future: Smaller, Higher-Tech and One-Way
The Coronavirus Will Change the Legal Industry's Approach to Remote Work—But How?
Baker McKenzie Shuts Down London Office Following Coronavirus Scare
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Strengthens Tokyo Office With Partner Hire From Big Four Japanese Firm AMT
K&L Gates Duo Leaves to Reunite with Former Leader at Sreenivasan Chambers
Clifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250