Baker McKenzie Surveys Staff Over London Office Return As DLA Also Mulls Reopening Base
Baker McKenzie has surveyed all its London people about a return to the office. One of its task force members in charge of the situation said that it had raised "quite a big ethical question."
May 07, 2020 at 05:16 AM
5 minute read
Baker McKenzie and DLA Piper are preparing for the possible return of their staff to U.K. offices, with both firms appointing task-forces to manage the process.
Baker McKenzie sent a survey to its entire London workforce on Monday to gather information and opinions on a potential return to the base, which closed on March 18 due to the current COVID-19 pandemic.
It asks people about their roles, where they currently sit in the office, and whether they take public transport when travelling to the base at 100 New Bridge St.
The survey also asks how people feel about coming back to the office and what the biggest challenges would be for them if they wish to stay working at home, or travel into the base.
The firm had set up a crisis team to handle the matter, which includes dispute resolution partner Joanna Ludlam, London managing partner Alex Chadwick and the firm's head of facilities.
Ludlam said the question of returning to the office is "emotional" as well as a "practical", and stressed the importance of diversity of thought when it comes to the situation.
She added: "We had heard anecdotally that there was a real range of views on this issue. This includes people who couldn't really contemplate spending any more time in the situation they have been in for weeks – for example, those living alone or in a flat-share, or people who live in places where broadband isn't reliable; or people on the other end of the spectrum who cannot comprehend coming back to the office because they are home-schooling or have other commitments."
Employees were also asked in the survey what they thought management should consider as they consider re-opening the office, and asked for people to contribute ideas on how the process could be handled.
A Baker McKenzie London partner said: "I think it's really important to ask the people that will be affected what they think. It will be hard to decide what to do about this because so many people will have different opinions on it."
The firm has asked staff to contribute to the process ahead of an address by U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Sunday. The PM said on Wednesday that he would give a statement on Sunday about plans to ease the lockdown.
Meanwhile, DLA Piper has also been planning for a return to the firm's U.K. offices, as part of a global working group's analysis as to whether U.K. staff could be back in the workplace by early June.
The firm has bases in London, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield, with management aiming to get a limited number of employees back in the office on a staggered basis. A spokesperson for the firm said that any return to the office would depend on the U.K. government's guidance.
Baker McKenzie's Ludlam said consideration of re-opening of its London operations raises "quite a big ethical question" about whether it is something the firm should be proactively doing, given the success its people have had working from home "without really any big challenges."
"Given that is the case, there is an overarching issue about whether we should be contributing to society by restricting the circulation of our people on public transport. We haven't reached any views on that just yet, but what is at the forefront of our minds is to make sure that we are contributing to efforts in keeping the virus under control," she explained.
The survey was sent out to all London lawyers and staff on Monday morning and is expected to close at the end of the day on Wednesday. Ludlam said that more than half of the office had already sent over their responses by Monday afternoon.
She added that the health and well-being of staff remains at the forefront of any decisions to re-open the office, and notes that the process for re-opening the London office after such an extensive closure will be more challenging than it was to initially shut it down.
The firm will take a "close look" at the government's guidance set to be issued on Sunday, Ludlam added, to see how realistic a return to the office would be, but says that they "have to be careful not to make too hasty a decision about things".
|Read more
Welcome to the Law Firm Office of the Future: Smaller, Higher-Tech and One-Way
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFCA Fines Metro Bank £16.7M Over ‘Financial Crime Failings’
Milbank Leads Bonus Race, Announces Year-End Pay News
K&L Gates Hires Energy Partner from Gibson Dunn in Singapore
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250