Magic Circle Partner Promotions Reveal Continued Oxbridge Dominance
An analysis of this year's UK promotions prompts campaigners to talk of an "elitist profession".
May 07, 2020 at 06:57 AM
3 minute read
Nearly half of all lawyers recently promoted to the partnerships of the Magic Circle law firms were educated at Oxbridge, according to analysis that highlights the dominance of the two universities – even at the most junior end of the lockstep.
At Slaughter and May, only two of the new partners did not attend either university, while five others – 71% - attended Oxford University or Cambridge University. Previous research by Legal Week found that two-thirds of the entire Slaughters partnership were educated at the same two institutions.
Across Allen & Overy, Linklaters, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughters, 21 out of 48 – or 45% – newly-promoted U.K. partners hailed from the either Oxford or Cambridge.
Nationwide, about 2% of the U.K.'s current university population attend Oxbridge.
Both Linklaters and Clifford Chance had significantly lower uptake of Oxbridge-educated partners compared with the other three firms: four of Linklaters' 14 additions and two of Clifford Chance's eight new partners went to the one of the institutions.
However, half of the new partners appointed at Allen & Overy and nearly two-thirds of the new partners at Freshfields were Oxbridge-educated, with both figures higher than the overall partnership average.
Commenting on the numbers, Dr Wanda Wyporska, executive director at Equality Trust, said: "Yet again we see the Oxbridge graduates dominate the new partners appointed, reinforcing the stereotype of an elite and elitist profession. It does the profession little good to underestimate the importance of and indeed business case for wider participation within its ranks and the promotion of a diverse range of people. There are problems at all levels of the legal profession in terms of diverse representation, which surely ought to be examined in far more detail."
None of the firms provided comment in time for publication.
|Read more
Magic Circle Partnerships' Oxbridge and Private School Bias Exposed
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFCA Fines Metro Bank £16.7M Over ‘Financial Crime Failings’
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250