Spanish Firms Considering Office Returns As Lockdown Set to Continue
Spanish heavyweight Cuatrecasas is set to maintain remote working for its global offices until at least May 31, while others consider the options.
May 07, 2020 at 07:28 AM
2 minute read
Major law firms in Spain including Hogan Lovells are discussing how best to redeploy staff to their offices as the country prepares to loosen its COVID-19 lockdown restrictions in the coming weeks.
A person with knowledge of the Spanish legal market said that local firm Uría Menéndez is deciding how and when to return to the office, with discussions taking place within the next two weeks. Hogan Lovells is also holding similar discussions.
Meanwhile, Spanish heavyweight Cuatrecasas decided in a board meeting last week to maintain remote working for its global offices until at least May 31, according to a person close to the matter.
A Madrid-based partner at Hogan Lovells said the sentiment in Spain is that the majority of international firms will reopen in June, as the government is considering an extension to the lockdown. He added that one option could see staff splitting time in the office.
"It won't be everybody at the same time, but maybe 50% of the teams in different turns per day", he said.
The partner added that the sooner offices reopen, the sooner a sense of normality will return.
"A delay on [returning] is not good for anybody", he continued. "Taking precautions with a phased – but quick – return is the best solution in my opinion."
An employee at KPMG Legal in Spain added that the firm is "continually analysing the situation to determine when is the best time to return to normality".
Additionally, in jurisdictions where offices are allowed to open as part of loosened lockdown measures, Dentons will implement safety protocols and allow a gradual return of staff, a spokesperson said.
Elsewhere, firms in Italy have begun reopening offices, with BonelliErede, Chiomenti and U.K. headquartered Bird & Bird taking limited measures.
Read More:
Returning to Work Post-Lockdown: Lessons From Asia
Italy's Elite Law Firms to Reopen as Nation Eases Lockdown Restrictions
Spanish Firm Raises €20M With Cash Call to Shore Up Finances
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinklaters Sees Latest Partner Exit as UK Leveraged Finance Partner Walks To Simpson Thacher
2 minute readEx-Dewey & LeBoeuf Banking Lawyer on Trial in Germany’s Cum-Ex Tax Scandal
DLA Piper & Hogan Lovells Expand German Construction and Property Practices
2 minute readWhite & Case, Cleary Among Firms Gearing Up for Biggest London IPO Since 2022
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 3Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250