Capital Markets Lawyers Busy as Companies Rush to Raise Funds
Australian companies have rushed to raise money on the stock market n the face of the COVID-19 economic crisis, keeping law firms' capital markets teams busy. Herbert Smith Freehills and Linklaters-aligned Allens have each advised on capital raisings totaling more than A$8 billion (US$5.24 billion) since mid-February.
May 10, 2020 at 08:00 PM
6 minute read
Australian companies have rushed to raise money on the stock market to shore up their balance sheets in the face of the COVID-19 economic crisis, keeping corporate law firms' capital markets teams busy even as other parts of law slow down.
In the calendar year to date, some $14.9 billion has been raised in 235 separate equity secondary raisings on the Australian Securities Exchange, according to data supplied by Dealogic to Law.com International.
At the same point in the preceding three years, just $4.6 billion, $6.6 billion and $3.4 billion had been raised.
"It's quite a staggering amount," said Philippa Stone, joint global head of Herbert Smith Freehills' equity capital markets team. "It has been an incredibly active time."
Stone said the raisings have come "thicker and faster" than they did during the global financial crisis, when it took time for businesses to come up against their banking covenants. In the current crisis, many businesses such as those in tourism and hospitality and retail suffered an immediate revenue hit once health restrictions were put in place.
The firm's capital raisings have fallen into two categories.
There are those where companies need to strengthen their balance sheet because of the economic impact of the COVID-19 crisis. For example, HSF has advised health care companies affected by the ban on elective surgery—including hospital group Ramsay Health Care on its A$1.2 billion placement and A$200 million share purchase plan, and hearing aid manufacturer Cochlear on its A$880 million placement and A$220 million share purchase plan.
Other companies are doing well despite the crisis. HSF advised data center NEXTDC on its A$672 million institutional placement and A$191 million nonunderwritten share purchase plan.
At the start of the year, HSF's capital markets team expected to be busy preparing initial public offerings, but now those lawyers who would have been working on IPOs are working on capital raisings, with the expectation that most but not all IPOs will be delayed until next year.
In total, Herbert Smith Freehills has advised on raisings of A$8.2 billion (US$5.4 billion) since mid-February.
Linklaters-aligned Allens has advised on A$8.6 billion (US$5.6 billion) in capital raisings, including the A$3.5 billion (US$2.3 billion) raising by National Australia Bank to bolster its balance sheet. Local corporate firm Clayton Utz said it has worked on about 30 separate capital raisings since the start of the calendar year, among them companies seeking emergency equity raising, including grocery distribution company Metcash and funeral home business InvoCare.
Stone's colleague Michael Ziegelaar, co-head of the Australian equity capital markets group at HSF, expects the rush to quiet down—but only for a while. Most of those firms with an immediate need for cash have already tapped the market, but the market might pick up again towards the end of the year as companies start looking at their banking arrangements and covenants.
Raisings have got a "bit quieter" in the last week, said Adam D'Andreti, a partner in local firm Gilbert + Tobin's corporate advisory team, who said there was a point in time where every weekend he was getting hired for another two raisings that were going to happen the following week.
Since the start of March, the firm has worked on deals to raise capital for such companies as QBE Insurance and Charter Hall Social Infrastructure REIT, a real estate fund.
Gilbert + Tobin also worked on the deal to raise A$1.1 billion for Newcrest Mining, so it could acquire a gold mine in Ecuador—a sign that not all capital raisings are from COVID-19 affected companies seeking to shore up their balance sheets.
While the initial burst of raisings has taken place, D'Andreti expects more real estate companies to tap the market in the coming weeks, before a second wave later in the year. These are more likely to be complex transactions involving restructures and a strategic investor taking a significant equity stake, he said.
Gilbert + Tobin has done a comparison of capital raisings in the first two months of the global financial crisis and those in the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of raisings in the current crisis is about double the number done during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the firm found.
D'Andreti also cited Bloomberg figures showing Australian companies raised $8.9 billion in April—the biggest monthly total since the great financial crisis of 2009 and close to the $11.1 billion raised in the U.S.—a market 28 times the size of Australia's.
One reason for the relatively high figure is Australia's huge pool of retirement savings—close to A$3 trillion (US$2 trillion) in February.
Another is the regulatory environment.
"From a regulatory standpoint, it's much easier for companies in Australia to raise quickly in response to this sort of event because we have relief that means you don't have to use a prospectus," D'Andreti said. "You can actually just physically do it quicker."
In particular, companies can use what's known as the "low doc" regime which allows companies to disclose any material information they haven't previously informed the market of, instead of issuing a prospectus.
The surge in capital raisings comes as regulators in Australia loosen rules to help companies restore their balance sheets more quickly.
The Australian Securities Exchange is temporarily allowing companies to do placements equal to 25% of their issued stock, up from 15%. In a placement, a company raises money by issuing new shares to a group of shareholders or investors.
The regulator also requires companies to subsequently make the same offer to retail shareholders via a share placement plan or similar arrangement.
While the change has been useful, D'Andreti said its influence shouldn't be overstated. Only about a third of placements have temporary extra placement capacity, with companies doing larger raisings of over A$100 million more likely to rely on it, figures complied by Gilbert + Tobin show.
Separately, the corporate regulator has also allowed companies that have had their shares suspended for up to 10 days in the previous year to use the low doc capital raising regime. Previously the limit was five days.
"This provides entities with more flexibility to remain in voluntary suspension for longer periods while they structure their offer, engage with investors and other third parties such as debt financiers, and finalize details of their capital raising plans," Baker McKenzie said in a note to clients.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250