Burford Accused of Manipulating 2019 Financial Results
In its second scathing attack on the litigation funder, Muddy Waters claims Burford contrived to present a rosier financial picture than was actually the case.
May 12, 2020 at 07:03 AM
3 minute read
Litigation funder Burford Capital has been accused of manipulating its latest financial results, in yet another scathing attack on the firm by short seller Muddy Waters.
In a report released on Tuesday on Burford's 2019 financials, Muddy Waters alleges that the litigation funder used "reclassification" and "redefinition" in order to "inflate cash receipts, operating profit, and to otherwise present a misleading picture of the business".
Last month, Burford released results that showed profits fell by 21% to $279.3 million from $354.8 million over the 12 months to December 2019.
However, the short seller claims Burford's cash receipts in fact show a year-on-year decline of an additional 11.8%, and suggests the firm's operating profits are in fact 8% lower than the figure claimed.
The outfit further accuses Burford of "padding" the results by changing certain definitions, suggesting its real "balance sheet deployments" actually declined in 2019 "by -35.5%, rather than the claimed -30.6%".
Claiming that it is "cutting through the new bullsh*t", Muddy Waters said: "We wonder whether all this goalpost movement was the real reason Burford delayed releasing its 2019 accounts."
It is Muddy Waters' second blistering attack on Burford's financial practices, with the firm last summer accusing the funder of being insolvent, calling it "a poor business masquerading as a great one".
That led the funder to claim that it had been the victim of "illegal market manipulation", and to ask a London court for judicial approval to obtain details from the London Stock Exchange about who was behind allegedly suspicious trading.
At that time Burford's London share price halved to around 700p. Since then it has slid further still. But the latest Muddy Waters report does not appear to have had such a strong effect, with shares recovering to roughly where they started the day as of 11.30am BST at 459p. The share price is almost 70% down on this time last 12 months ago.
A spokesperson for Burford said: "We don't comment on anything that Muddy Waters puts out."
|Read more
|Burford, Quinn Emanuel Make Case for Manipulation in Litigation Funder's Stock Plunge
|After Declines, Burford CEO Points to Busy 2020, Cites COVID-19 Claims Ahead
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250