Global Firm, In-House Collaboration Announces 'Open Access' Matter Platform Lupl
Lupl is expected to be open access, meaning that any legal department and law firm will be able to use the technology as they wish. Company founders say they're stressing data integration in the product's release.
May 13, 2020 at 12:37 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Representing one of the largest collaborations in law, a group of law firms and corporations announced today the formation of Lupl, a platform that looks to synchronize everything that goes into a legal matter. And it comes with a major sticking point: It's open to everybody.
Lupl is a legal matter management platform that looks to bring together all parts of a legal matter, including people, documents, information, communications and technology applications, in a single, secure space.
Notably, Lupl is expected to be open access, meaning that any legal department and law firm will be able to use the technology as they wish. It will feature open APIs, allowing other legal technology providers to plug into the Lupl system.
But the new platform isn't aiming to replace any the current software legal teams already use. "The core of what Lupl is trying to do is provide this platform to enable people to bring their own systems and integrate them," said Matt Pollins, chief commercial officer of Lupl. He stressed that Lupl is not open source, but instead "open in the sense of Open APIs."
Given the diversity of software used by legal offices, however, Pollins said the company approaches integration as an ongoing task. "We focused at the outset on what we think are the most widely used technology solutions in our industry. … We're going to be looking to build out that partner ecosystem. That's something we anticipate growing and will also be a big area of focus for us in the coming months."
He added that in addition to enabling more integration, the development of Lupl was also fueled by a desire to address the "lack of good mobile-first digital tools that really reflect modern ways of working." The platform is expected to be available via both the web and mobile; the company notes on its website that an iOS app is already running, with an Android app coming soon.
For now, the platform itself is currently in the process of being finalized in a private beta, with a public release expected in 2021. While the beta test is invite-only, Lupl is asking anyone interested to reach out to the company via its website.
Lupl's technology has also been in development for a few years, with the company touting a number of high-profile developers with an international flair, spanning the worlds of Big Law, corporate legal departments, legal technology providers and legal education.
The platform was incubated by three major law firms—CMS, Cooley and Rajah & Tann Asia—with input from an advisory board of 16 in-house lawyers. Heidi Gardner, faculty chair and distinguished fellow at Harvard Law School, also aided Lupl's development. What's more, the platform has an international reach in its wider testing, with Magic Circle firm Slaughter and May, Corrs in Australia, Khaitan & Co in India and One Essex Court, a leading barristers' chambers in London, participating.
Adam Ruttenberg, partner at Cooley, explained that Lupl is being funded by his law firm, CMS and Rajah & Tann Asia. However, Pollins stressed that the beta is free and Lupl is funded through its public release. "Beyond that, we're conscious that this is something that is going to have to stand on its open two feet and be self-funding," he explained.
Lupl's aim to allow more integration has resonated with many of its backers. "From a law firm perspective, it was critically important for us, when we were getting people started, to make sure that if this was going to work it had to be open to all law firms, all clients, all legal tech vendors," Ruttenberg said.
Given the variety of law firms and legal departments that helped provide input for the tool's development, Lupl is also hoping to help enable more cross-legal data sharing. Pollins explained, "One of the pain points we heard was the feeling was that there is a lack of good [legal matter] data… It's hard to get access to that kind of data in a user-friendly way, and we think there's a big opportunity for Lupl to play a role in that."
He specifically noted the company is building capabilities "around diversity and inclusion data, so if Lupl is a place where people work together on legal matters there is an opportunity—subject to compliance with all applicable privacy regulations—to actually surface ops and diversity inclusion dashboards."
Michelle Fang, vice president and chief legal officer at Turo, also touted the tool's open nature in the company's press release. "Lupl's open industry platform has the potential to enhance transparency and collaboration and deliver better, more modern ways of working within our department, with other business functions, and with law firms."
The release also included statements from major legal technology companies, notably major document management providers iManage and NetDocuments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250