Canadian Lawyers in US Worry Amid Closed Borders, Travel Bans and Tougher Immigration Rules
Recently imposed rules do not apply to employment-based immigration for professionals who are in the U.S. on non-immigrant visas, but they do leave open the possibility that these programs will be curtailed in the future.
May 15, 2020 at 07:46 PM
4 minute read
Canadian lawyers working in the United States on temporary, non-immigrant visas face more restrictions on their movement as a result of the COVID-19 border closures and travel bans.
"Anyone who's currently in the United States on assignment is anxious because if they have a family member who becomes ill abroad and they want to go visit that family member, for instance, the question is, will they [be able to] come back," said Betsy Morgan, head of Baker McKenzie's global immigration and mobility practice. "The short answer is no. The longer answer is if they're doing work that is essential, they may be able to get back in."
But the interpretation of "essential" varies and there is a high risk that a nonpermanent resident who needs to travel abroad will not be able to return until the travel ban is lifted, she said.
Compounding the concern for Canadian and other lawyers working in the U.S. is the White House executive order issued April 22, in which President Donald Trump temporarily halted the issuance of green cards and suspended immigration into the U.S. Although the new regulation does not apply to employment-based immigration for professionals who are in the U.S. on non-immigrant visas, it does leave open the possibility that these programs will be curtailed in the future.
Trump initially described a broad immigration ban but changed it so that temporary work visas would be exempt from the order—a move seen as a capitulation to business.
A Canadian lawyer currently in the U.S. on a TN visa, a temporary work visa granted to nonimmigrant professionals under NAFTA, said it's worrisome knowing that it's not advisable to cross the border. The U.S.-qualified lawyer, who practices in-house with a company in California and is registered with the state bar, has not left the U.S. since the travel ban was enacted but previously went back to Canada once a month.
"If you go, you don't know if you're going to be able to come back and your livelihood is here," the lawyer said. "It's a toss-up. I'm just hoping that no one [in my family] gets sick because family comes first."
Vaitiari Rodriguez, a lawyer with Foley & Lardner, said some of the temporary visas serve as a bridge to later become a permanent resident. Legal recruiter Jonathan Marsden also says this immigration pattern is not uncommon among lawyers.
"Although a number of lawyers who move internationally do end up just doing two-to-four years and then return home, a lot do actually remain in the country they move to," Marsden said.
For now, foreign nationals can still apply for a change of visa status without having to leave the U.S., but Rodriguez said she worries about the backlog of applications. In late March, the U.S. closed consulates and suspended the premium processing option.
"The tightening of international borders in reaction to COVID presents a challenge for cross-border lawyers and the cross-border legal industry," says Ivo Entchev, the president of the Canadian American Bar Association, which has a membership of approximately 250 lawyers.
In 2017, the association testified on the importance of the TN visa classification for the legal industry during NAFTA renegotiations. In 2016, almost 15,000 TN visas were issued, according to the Department of State. These were not classified by occupation.
"A sustained interruption to the free flow of legal labor across the Canada-U.S. border—under TN authorization and otherwise—will hurt the cross-border business community," Entchev said.
Morgan said individuals and companies are now applying earlier for status extensions regardless of their visa classification and are beginning to think about permanent residence sooner than perhaps they usually would.
"Planning ahead is important at this point," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCharles Russell Speechlys Gains Traction in Latin America
Trump and China: Lawyers Warn of Risk to the Practice of Law
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250