Canadian Lawyers in US Worry Amid Closed Borders, Travel Bans and Tougher Immigration Rules
Recently imposed rules do not apply to employment-based immigration for professionals who are in the U.S. on non-immigrant visas, but they do leave open the possibility that these programs will be curtailed in the future.
May 15, 2020 at 07:46 PM
4 minute read
Canadian lawyers working in the United States on temporary, non-immigrant visas face more restrictions on their movement as a result of the COVID-19 border closures and travel bans.
"Anyone who's currently in the United States on assignment is anxious because if they have a family member who becomes ill abroad and they want to go visit that family member, for instance, the question is, will they [be able to] come back," said Betsy Morgan, head of Baker McKenzie's global immigration and mobility practice. "The short answer is no. The longer answer is if they're doing work that is essential, they may be able to get back in."
But the interpretation of "essential" varies and there is a high risk that a nonpermanent resident who needs to travel abroad will not be able to return until the travel ban is lifted, she said.
Compounding the concern for Canadian and other lawyers working in the U.S. is the White House executive order issued April 22, in which President Donald Trump temporarily halted the issuance of green cards and suspended immigration into the U.S. Although the new regulation does not apply to employment-based immigration for professionals who are in the U.S. on non-immigrant visas, it does leave open the possibility that these programs will be curtailed in the future.
Trump initially described a broad immigration ban but changed it so that temporary work visas would be exempt from the order—a move seen as a capitulation to business.
A Canadian lawyer currently in the U.S. on a TN visa, a temporary work visa granted to nonimmigrant professionals under NAFTA, said it's worrisome knowing that it's not advisable to cross the border. The U.S.-qualified lawyer, who practices in-house with a company in California and is registered with the state bar, has not left the U.S. since the travel ban was enacted but previously went back to Canada once a month.
"If you go, you don't know if you're going to be able to come back and your livelihood is here," the lawyer said. "It's a toss-up. I'm just hoping that no one [in my family] gets sick because family comes first."
Vaitiari Rodriguez, a lawyer with Foley & Lardner, said some of the temporary visas serve as a bridge to later become a permanent resident. Legal recruiter Jonathan Marsden also says this immigration pattern is not uncommon among lawyers.
"Although a number of lawyers who move internationally do end up just doing two-to-four years and then return home, a lot do actually remain in the country they move to," Marsden said.
For now, foreign nationals can still apply for a change of visa status without having to leave the U.S., but Rodriguez said she worries about the backlog of applications. In late March, the U.S. closed consulates and suspended the premium processing option.
"The tightening of international borders in reaction to COVID presents a challenge for cross-border lawyers and the cross-border legal industry," says Ivo Entchev, the president of the Canadian American Bar Association, which has a membership of approximately 250 lawyers.
In 2017, the association testified on the importance of the TN visa classification for the legal industry during NAFTA renegotiations. In 2016, almost 15,000 TN visas were issued, according to the Department of State. These were not classified by occupation.
"A sustained interruption to the free flow of legal labor across the Canada-U.S. border—under TN authorization and otherwise—will hurt the cross-border business community," Entchev said.
Morgan said individuals and companies are now applying earlier for status extensions regardless of their visa classification and are beginning to think about permanent residence sooner than perhaps they usually would.
"Planning ahead is important at this point," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLosing its 'Sparkle'? Why Latham Has Faced a Stream of Exits in Europe, UK
6 minute read'Send These Guys Back to the US': Lawyers on Google's EU Antitrust Complaint Against Microsoft
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250