Law Firms in Paris Start to 'Unthaw'
A week after France lifted two months of strict lockdown measures to combat COVID-19, law firms in Paris are slowly starting to bring their offices back to life.
May 19, 2020 at 03:09 PM
4 minute read
At one elite French firm, the cafeteria area is closed and lunching in it is prohibited. At a Big Law office, brown bags in the conference room are fine as long as their owners observe social distancing.
A week after France lifted two months of strict lockdown measures to combat COVID-19, law firms in Paris are slowly starting to bring their offices back to life.
The ways the firms are reopening, or not, vary widely, but managing partners say they are following two basic principles: heeding French government guidance and leaving the decision to return to the office up to the individual.
For this first phase of the relaxation of restrictions, which lasts until June 2, the government is still encouraging remote working whenever possible. This is especially true in the Paris area, which the government still considers a region at risk for spread of the COVID-19.
"We plan to reopen after three weeks of no increase in new cases in the community," Patrick Tardivy, a partner at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe and head of the firm's Paris office, told Law.com International in an email. "At that time, the return will be voluntary. We believe this is the most responsible approach for the community, our clients and our people."
A representative for another Big Law firm said the firm's Paris team "continues to work remotely and our clients are continuing to receive full support.
"Like every firm, we will carefully consider when and how our people can return to the office safely, and we will follow the government's guidance," the representative said.
Offices that have reopened are doing so in close and continuing consultation with their staffs, partners said.
Jeantet, a top-tier French firm with 120 lawyers in Paris, produced an 11-page guidebook to reopening its offices, a joint effort based on a firmwide poll and bringing in professional, administrative and communications staff members, the firm said.
"The discussions were very animated," said Catherine Saint Geniest, co-managing partner of Jeantet.
"People liked working from home, but some lawyers really wanted to come back one or two days per week, just to make a change or to be able to work quietly while the children are still out of school. The question became how to provide a short-term solution that made everyone feel comfortable," she said.
Jeantet's guidelines include instructions for how many people could come back to work (no more than 70 people at any time), how that would be determined (by online sign-up), and how they should arrive (by car, bike or foot, avoiding public transportation if at all possible).
Elevator access is restricted to two mask-wearing people at a time, and meetings are limited to four socially distanced people. Use of the cafeteria area is prohibited, as is eating in the office. Handwashing is required before touching any shared equipment.
At Fieldfisher in Paris, a task force that includes four of the office's 10 partners is in charge of new protocols, such as one-way corridors, tape on the floor to mark social distancing, unplugging the office refrigerator and locking away the coffee cups.
Most lawyers are still working from home, but the ones who have come back even for a few days a week are "delighted," said Christopher Mesnooh, an M&A partner.
"My two associates and I brought our lunches into the conference room and had our first real catch-up in two months," he said. "There's a conviviality that we all missed. It's not the way it was, and probably won't be for some time. But things are becoming unthawed."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's New Partner Class Leans Toward Corporate Practices
Milan to Host 2025 Legal Innovation & Technology Awards, Nominations Open
2 minute readTrio of Firms Act On Multibillion Dollar Claim Over Iran-Pakistan Gas Pipeline Deal In Paris
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250