Singapore International Mediation Centre Implements Faster, Lower-Cost Process During COVID-19 Pandemic
A new fee schedule will especially benefit parties with lower-valued disputes.
May 19, 2020 at 11:37 AM
3 minute read
The Singapore International Mediation Centre is implementing an expedited mediation process with lower costs for the rest of the year to help businesses ease dispute resolution burdens during the novel coronavirus pandemic.
Under the new COVID-19 protocol, parties start a mediation process within 10 working days after filing a request with an initial S$250 (US$175) fee. The SIMC has implemented a new scale of case fees for disputes based on their values. For disputes with a value below S$1 million (US$700,000), each party will pay S$3,000, which includes fees to mediators. Rates increase incrementally for disputes with a higher dollar value. For cases valued over S$5 million, the organization charges up to S$10,000 in fees.
The new rates represent significant discounts for parties with lower-valued disputes, according to chief executive Chuan Wee Meng, who said the SIMC had previously charged a flat S$6,000 case management fee per party that did not include fees for mediators.
"We hope that this [change] will increase access to mediation for all parties," Chuan said.
The mediation will be conducted online under the new protocol. Chuan said until restrictions on travel and in-person meetings are lifted in Singapore, he expects the mediation process to continue to be carried out online. Singapore has imposed strict limits on in-person gatherings since late March when the country saw a spike of new cases.
Chuan said the new measures aim to help businesses focus resources on other challenges during the pandemic. "During this period of uncertainty, instead of being mired in protracted legal proceedings, businesses could use mediation first to resolve their disputes," he said.
"Many disputes arising from the global pandemic are not the fault of either party. Therefore, mediation stands out as an important mechanism to ensure that relationships are not derailed," he added. "The speed, cost and effectiveness will also ensure that the bottom lines remain intact."
Chuan also added that the new measures, which are effective until Dec. 31, are not only for disputes related to COVID-19 but for all disputes that arise during this time.
The SIMC was formed in 2014 as part of the effort to build the city-state into a regional center of cross-border dispute resolution. The SIMC boasts an 80% success rate for dispute settlement. Mediation settlements are enforceable in Singapore courts.
After September, courts in other countries that have ratified the Singapore Convention on Mediation will be able to enforce SIMC mediations. So far over 50 countries, including the United States and China, have signed the accord; Singapore, Fiji, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have ratified the treaty.*
*May 20 Updated: This story has been updated to include Saudi Arabia in the countries that have ratified the Singapore Convention.
|Related Stories:
The Singapore Convention: A Path To Advance International Economic Development With Mediation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's New Partner Class Leans Toward Corporate Practices
Milan to Host 2025 Legal Innovation & Technology Awards, Nominations Open
2 minute readTrio of Firms Act On Multibillion Dollar Claim Over Iran-Pakistan Gas Pipeline Deal In Paris
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250