Australian Government Inquiry to Examine Economic Impact of Litigation Funding and Class Actions
The results of the inquiry will be reported by December 7, the government said.
May 20, 2020 at 05:17 PM
3 minute read
An inquiry by Australia's Parliament into litigation funding and class actions will examine the impact of class actions on the economy and vulnerable businesses already suffering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The government's plan to launch the inquiry, dubbed Litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry, comes after calls by business leaders and business groups to regulate litigation funding and class actions amid claims businesses are being unfairly targeted.
According to the terms of reference, the inquiry will examine "whether the present level of regulation applying to Australia's growing class action industry is impacting fair and equitable outcomes for plaintiffs."
It will examine fees, costs and commissions earned by litigation funders and the impact of litigation funding on the damages and other compensation received by class members in class actions.
The financial and organizational relationship between funders and plaintiffs lawyers will also come under the microscope, "with a focus on whether these relationships have the capacity to impact on plaintiff lawyers' duties to their clients."
The inquiry, which will be run by lawmakers from a range of political parties, will also examine the effects of class actions on the economy and "the potential impact of Australia's current class action industry on vulnerable Australian business already suffering the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic."
The Victoria government is planning to allow lawyers in that state to take contingency fees and the inquiry will consider "whether this could lead to less financially viable outcomes for plaintiffs."
The inquiry by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services is to report by Dec. 7.
"Justice is not a business and the primary focus of those who work in the legal system should always be on getting the best outcomes for their clients, not on maximizing returns for hungry shareholders," Attorney-General Christian Porter said when he announced the date of the inquiry.
"I hope this inquiry will generate useful insights that will enable us to develop policies that will ensure the interests of Australians are better protected," he said.
Business groups want litigation funders to be regulated, arguing that class actions make it more difficult for businesses to operate.
"The inquiry needs to investigate the outrageous levels of returns that litigation funders (many of which are overseas firms) are receiving from class actions in Australia, to the detriment of plaintiffs, businesses and the broader community," Innes Willox, chief executive of the national employer association Ai Group, said in a statement.
"Litigation funders offer financial products to investors yet they are not subject to the regulations that apply to other providers of financial products. This is wrong and it needs to be addressed," Willox said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250