Law Firms in Australia Begin Opening Offices, but Remote Working May Win Out
Global law firms say even when restrictions are lifted, flexible working arrangements and working from home will remain in place.
May 20, 2020 at 04:48 PM
4 minute read
Law firms in Australia are taking a cautious approach to asking their employees to return to the office, even as the prime minister urges people to go back to work.
Even in Western Australia, which has led the way in relaxing COVID-19 restrictions, many firms are holding back.
Holman Fenwick Willan returned to normal operations in Perth, the state's capital, May 4, but other firms have been slower to move.
Ashurst encouraged staff to return to the Perth office beginning this week, but as of Wednesday only about half of the workforce had returned to that office.
Distancing measures in Ashurst's Perth office include flexible office hours to allow staff to avoid traveling on public transport during peak times; continued use of virtual meetings; minimal use of meeting rooms and cleaning between meetings; and limits on the number of people in enclosed spaces, including offices and elevators.
Ashurst is planning similar phased returns to the office in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra over the next couple of months, but dates are not fixed, the firm said.
"No one is being forced to return to the office. Many people will continue to work from home or work in other flexible ways (for example with staggered starts or only coming in on some days) if they want to," the firm said in a statement.
DLA Piper said in a statement that the "vast majority" of its staff continue to work remotely, but it is planning a phased return to work.
Staff will be able to begin a gradual, phased return to the Perth office at the end of the month, and staff in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne will likely start returning to the office starting in mid-June.
"We anticipate most people will transition back to the office for a few days a week and continue to work from home for the rest of their working week for the foreseeable future," the firm said.
It will stagger staff working hours to reduce the risk of crowding for those using public transport and delays caused by building entry rules.
Top-tier Australian corporate firm Corrs said it will continue to operate primarily on a remote basis, as it has been since March 18.
"Our remote working arrangements have proven to be very effective, and we intend to take a conservative approach to the use of our offices," the firm said.
The firm said it wants to iron out some practicalities, such as restrictions on the use of elevators and the impact that may have on efficient working arrangements, before more staff return to the office.
Baker McKenzie said its planning is "well-advanced for a return to our offices in the near future" but that a return will depend on the readiness of its buildings and public transport networks and guidance provided by governments.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison is urging Australians to get back to work, declaring earlier this month that the country had flattened the curve of daily new COVID-19 cases.
"But we now need to get a million Australians back to work. That is the curve we need to address," he said.
Australia has had 7,080 COVID-19 cases, resulting in 100 deaths. There were 12 new cases reported Tuesday.
Some law firms emphasized that even when restrictions are lifted, flexible working arrangements and working from home will remain in place.
"We are proud of the resilience and productivity our workforce has shown during this crisis and we are exploring ways of building on this by encouraging continued flexible work patterns," Ashurst said.
DLA Piper is encouraging staff to think about how they would like to continue to work remotely beyond the upcoming transition period.
"We expect and hope that our positive experience with remote working during the pandemic will result in more of our people working remotely more often in the future," the firm said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250