Law Firms in Australia Begin Opening Offices, but Remote Working May Win Out
Global law firms say even when restrictions are lifted, flexible working arrangements and working from home will remain in place.
May 20, 2020 at 04:48 PM
4 minute read
Law firms in Australia are taking a cautious approach to asking their employees to return to the office, even as the prime minister urges people to go back to work.
Even in Western Australia, which has led the way in relaxing COVID-19 restrictions, many firms are holding back.
Holman Fenwick Willan returned to normal operations in Perth, the state's capital, May 4, but other firms have been slower to move.
Ashurst encouraged staff to return to the Perth office beginning this week, but as of Wednesday only about half of the workforce had returned to that office.
Distancing measures in Ashurst's Perth office include flexible office hours to allow staff to avoid traveling on public transport during peak times; continued use of virtual meetings; minimal use of meeting rooms and cleaning between meetings; and limits on the number of people in enclosed spaces, including offices and elevators.
Ashurst is planning similar phased returns to the office in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra over the next couple of months, but dates are not fixed, the firm said.
"No one is being forced to return to the office. Many people will continue to work from home or work in other flexible ways (for example with staggered starts or only coming in on some days) if they want to," the firm said in a statement.
DLA Piper said in a statement that the "vast majority" of its staff continue to work remotely, but it is planning a phased return to work.
Staff will be able to begin a gradual, phased return to the Perth office at the end of the month, and staff in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne will likely start returning to the office starting in mid-June.
"We anticipate most people will transition back to the office for a few days a week and continue to work from home for the rest of their working week for the foreseeable future," the firm said.
It will stagger staff working hours to reduce the risk of crowding for those using public transport and delays caused by building entry rules.
Top-tier Australian corporate firm Corrs said it will continue to operate primarily on a remote basis, as it has been since March 18.
"Our remote working arrangements have proven to be very effective, and we intend to take a conservative approach to the use of our offices," the firm said.
The firm said it wants to iron out some practicalities, such as restrictions on the use of elevators and the impact that may have on efficient working arrangements, before more staff return to the office.
Baker McKenzie said its planning is "well-advanced for a return to our offices in the near future" but that a return will depend on the readiness of its buildings and public transport networks and guidance provided by governments.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison is urging Australians to get back to work, declaring earlier this month that the country had flattened the curve of daily new COVID-19 cases.
"But we now need to get a million Australians back to work. That is the curve we need to address," he said.
Australia has had 7,080 COVID-19 cases, resulting in 100 deaths. There were 12 new cases reported Tuesday.
Some law firms emphasized that even when restrictions are lifted, flexible working arrangements and working from home will remain in place.
"We are proud of the resilience and productivity our workforce has shown during this crisis and we are exploring ways of building on this by encouraging continued flexible work patterns," Ashurst said.
DLA Piper is encouraging staff to think about how they would like to continue to work remotely beyond the upcoming transition period.
"We expect and hope that our positive experience with remote working during the pandemic will result in more of our people working remotely more often in the future," the firm said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250