Women in the legal industry are concerned that the COVID-19 pandemic will drive further gender inequality within the profession, and that there are particular mental health issues arising for women currently working at home due to the crisis.
Mental Health and Gender Inequality Worries Affecting Women in Lockdown, First 100 Years Finds
"The strain on our mental health has been outrageous," one female law firm partner participant in the new research by First 100 Years said.
May 20, 2020 at 04:25 AM
3 minute read
Women in the legal industry are concerned that the COVID-19 pandemic will drive further gender inequality within the profession, and that there are particular mental health issues arising for women currently working at home due to the crisis.
The concerns were raised by participants in new research to coincide with the U.K.'s Mental Health Awareness Week. Project First 100 Years surveyed nearly 900 women across the globe who work in the industry about their concerns of the impact of COVID-19 on their mental health and gender equality.
Sixty five per cent of those surveyed believe that the crisis has "exaggerated existing inequalities between men and women", as women grapple with often taking on the brunt of childcare and home-schooling responsibilities alongside their professional work. As a result, 66% of the women surveyed also said that the crisis is having an impact on their mental health.
"I'm not sure how much longer my brain can juggle everything."
One law firm partner who took part in the survey said: "Working at home around the clock whilst all staff (apart from partners) have been furloughed and having to juggle a 4 year old and an ill husband is exhausting whilst dealing with the reality that the firm just may not survive this. I'm not sure how much longer my brain can juggle everything."
Another participant said that as a result of her firm furloughing the majority of its staff, "the only two [staff] kept at my office were the mother of a five-year-old trying to home school and myself, currently pregnant. The strain on our mental health has been outrageous."
Recent research by U.K. lawyers' mental health charity LawCare highlighted financial stresses and the possibility of being forced to return to offices as current concerns for those in the industry.
While some in the industry have recently suggested firm's embrace of remote working during the coronavirus pandemic could positively impact women, others fear that diversity initiatives will be de-prioritised as firms and companies seek to protect their bottom lines.
Fifty per cent of the First 100 Years' survey respondents fear diversity initiatives will be given less focus and funding, while earlier in May women leaders at New Law businesses signed an open letter urging general counsels to renew diversity commitments in order to maintain supplier diversity.
First 100 Years founder Dana Denis-Smith said: "I think the message to the legal profession is pretty clear: don't let the pandemic put diversity back another 100 years.
"Women expect better in exchange for the massive contribution they have been making for years. Leaders across the board should take note of the results and act.
|
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250