Mental Health and Gender Inequality Worries Affecting Women in Lockdown, First 100 Years Finds
"The strain on our mental health has been outrageous," one female law firm partner participant in the new research by First 100 Years said.
May 20, 2020 at 04:25 AM
3 minute read
Women in the legal industry are concerned that the COVID-19 pandemic will drive further gender inequality within the profession, and that there are particular mental health issues arising for women currently working at home due to the crisis.
The concerns were raised by participants in new research to coincide with the U.K.'s Mental Health Awareness Week. Project First 100 Years surveyed nearly 900 women across the globe who work in the industry about their concerns of the impact of COVID-19 on their mental health and gender equality.
Sixty five per cent of those surveyed believe that the crisis has "exaggerated existing inequalities between men and women", as women grapple with often taking on the brunt of childcare and home-schooling responsibilities alongside their professional work. As a result, 66% of the women surveyed also said that the crisis is having an impact on their mental health.
"I'm not sure how much longer my brain can juggle everything."
One law firm partner who took part in the survey said: "Working at home around the clock whilst all staff (apart from partners) have been furloughed and having to juggle a 4 year old and an ill husband is exhausting whilst dealing with the reality that the firm just may not survive this. I'm not sure how much longer my brain can juggle everything."
Another participant said that as a result of her firm furloughing the majority of its staff, "the only two [staff] kept at my office were the mother of a five-year-old trying to home school and myself, currently pregnant. The strain on our mental health has been outrageous."
Recent research by U.K. lawyers' mental health charity LawCare highlighted financial stresses and the possibility of being forced to return to offices as current concerns for those in the industry.
While some in the industry have recently suggested firm's embrace of remote working during the coronavirus pandemic could positively impact women, others fear that diversity initiatives will be de-prioritised as firms and companies seek to protect their bottom lines.
Fifty per cent of the First 100 Years' survey respondents fear diversity initiatives will be given less focus and funding, while earlier in May women leaders at New Law businesses signed an open letter urging general counsels to renew diversity commitments in order to maintain supplier diversity.
First 100 Years founder Dana Denis-Smith said: "I think the message to the legal profession is pretty clear: don't let the pandemic put diversity back another 100 years.
"Women expect better in exchange for the massive contribution they have been making for years. Leaders across the board should take note of the results and act.
Read More:
The COVID-19 Lockdown Is a Game Changer for Women in Law
Less Money, Furloughing and Being Forced Back to Offices: UK Lawyers' COVID-19 Concerns
New Law Leaders Call On GCs To Maintain Diversity Commitments Amid Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250