South Africa's 'Irrational' Lockdown Rules Face Legal Challenge
The South African government introduced a lockdown amid the COVID-19 outbreak. But detractors have suggested the rules are too restrictive.
May 20, 2020 at 11:27 AM
2 minute read
Johannesburg
South Africa's opposition parties have launched a legal challenge to the government's lockdown regulations.
The main South African opposition party, the Democratic Alliance (DA), has announced its intention to take the ANC government to court to fight what it describes on its website as "irrational" lockdown regulations that are "doing more harm than good."
In his announcement, DA interim leader John Steenhuisen vowed that his party would fight to overturn every lockdown regulation that he considers irrational.
These regulations have been enforced by "petty authoritarians, hopped up on power, who are allowed to run amock," he said.
The managing partner of a law firm in South Africa said of the impending court actions: "It's good to test the validity of the regulations and hold the government accountable."
Another lawyer said: "Thankfully, South Africa has a world-class constitution, including a provision for the courts to issue instructions to government."
The restrictions also include a ban on the sale of several products such as cigarettes and alcohol, a military-enforced nighttime curfew, and outdoor exercising restricted to three hours a day on pavements only.
Recent research by the University of Cape Town indicates that the ban on cigarette sales is "feeding an illicit market that will be increasingly difficult to eradicate" once the lockdown is over.
Research last week showed that the lockdown had created significant hardships for a number of smaller South African law firms.
Read more:
South Africa's Smaller Firms Face Ruin as Nation Extends COVID-19 Lockdown
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Hogan Lovells and Burges Salmon Secure Lead Roles in Largest Ever UK Defence Ministry Contract
2 minute read
Latham, Cleary, Clifford Chance Help Middle East Sovereign Wealth Funds Monetise Assets
3 minute read
‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Big Four Firm’s Legal Arm Entering the US
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1UK Firm Womble Bond to Roll Out AI Tool Across Whole Firm
- 2Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
- 3Blockchain’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment Privacy Paradoxes
- 4Prior Written Notice: Calabrese v. City of Albany
- 5Learning From Experience: The Best and Worst of Years Past
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
