UK Takeover Panel Decision Could Set Global Precedent on Bid Retractions
Brigadier attempted to walk away from its bid for Moss Bros, citing COVID-19 as its reason.
May 21, 2020 at 05:54 AM
3 minute read
A U.K. Takeover Panel decision rejecting an attempt to retract its takeover bid for clothing chain Moss Bros due to COVID-19 is likely to a set a new precedent worldwide, according to lawyers close to the deal.
On May 19, 2020 the Takeover Panel concluded that Brigadier Acquisition "should not be permitted to invoke any of the relevant conditions at this time" to lapse its £22.6 million offer.
The ruling is viewed as notable given the current deal climate in which other bidders may also look to retract their offers.
One corporate partner with knowledge of the situation said that it is also significant given the U.K. panel is well-respected globally and other countries, such as Australia and New Zealand, have similar systems. This means the decision could become a new precedent case for other jurisdictions as well as the U.K., the partner added.
It is important for two types of bidders, according to the partner. "The people who have already bid and think they can back out will think again, and those who are thinking to bid now will know that they will be stuck with their choice".
The last time the Takeover Panel heard a similar case was in relation to advertising agency WPP attempting to retract its bid for Tempus, following the 9/11 attacks, the partner added.
"It was held then that they couldn't walk away and now it was decided that COVID-19 was still not material enough", the partner said. "Moss Bros will now be the leading case, although it may still be appealed".
Ashurst is acting for Moss Bros with a team led by Tom Mercer and Tom Connor, having been called on when the matter when it went to the Takeover Panel.
Meanwhile, Proskauer Rose is advising Brigadier, with partner Rob Day leading.
European M&A has dropped sharply since the pandemic lockdown. But some deals have been agreed, including the £31 billion merger between mobile networks O2 and Virgin Media.
|Read More:
Shearman Joins UK Trio On £31 Billion O2-Virgin Media Merger
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Continues Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Ted Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
- 2How Have You Fared in 2024? Share Your Insights in the Managing Partners Survey
- 3Court Rules Mere Conduit Defense Not Suitable for a Motion to Dismiss
- 4Ironclad Officially Launches New Gen AI Assistant Jurist
- 5After Litigation with Ex-COO, Proskauer Fills Role
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250