Just-in-Time Sourcing: Revisiting the Law Firm Delivery Strategy
How can firms better manage costs, optimise margins, and continue service delivery in a time of extreme economic uncertainty?
May 22, 2020 at 06:12 AM
5 minute read
As the world continues to scramble in response to the coronavirus outbreak, the legal industry is preparing itself for an inevitable recession. Undoubtedly, the economic fallout will impact law firms as well as young associates who are just beginning to find their footing in the workplace.
A recession will serve another blow to many traditional law firms that are already struggling to differentiate themselves and justify high hourly rates. A reduction in corporate demand for law firm services is expected, as companies tighten their belts.
Price-sensitive clients now have more options available to them for legal services than they did during the Great Financial Crisis – particularly for commoditised work traditionally delivered by junior lawyers.
In the face of a protracted economic slowdown, how can firms better manage costs, optimise margins, and continue service delivery are critical? It's time law firms seriously consider employing the long-standing "just-in-time" resourcing model.
The Right Resourcing Model?
Law firms generally keep large teams of employed associates to deliver legal services, with few deploying contract resourcing in any significant way.
Historically, firms have been reluctant to embrace any form of "just-in-time" production in thinking about how they build their teams. Keeping a full bench on a law firm's books is costly; the costs of a full-time associate are significantly higher than the already high salaries.
This is generally not an issue, if the team is highly utilized, but this isunlikely in the anticipated economic environment for many firms.
However, laying off staff during an economic downturn isn't necessarily an antidote. If firms pare down their associate ranks, they risk not being able to uphold their commitments to clients and discarding the benefits of leverage when work presents itself.
Deleveraging through layoffs also places significant pressure on remaining employees, ultimately leading to retention issues when the economy recovers. When the economy does finally recover, many firms who have laid off legal staff will scramble to find associate talent at different levels.
For associates, worries about the coronavirus aftermath loom just as large. Sweeping layoffs of junior-level lawyers are likely, with law firms hanging on to senior associates who bill out at loftier rates and can run deals or matters.
What's worse, young lawyers who get derailed by economic declines typically find it difficult to get their careers back on a similar professional trajectory, as painfully evidenced by previous financial crises.
During downturns, many practised lawyers are forced to take any work they can find. Even when the economy recuperates, firms can overlook junior-level lawyers who had been laid off, in favour of more junior associates or law school graduates.
Contract Resourcing: The Right Talent at the Right Time
In an age when clients' budgets are shrinking but staffing costs remain high, forward-thinking firms are already realizing the value of using contract talent to fulfil their service obligations to clients.
Whilst access to contract professionals has tended to focus on more seasoned lawyers to plug a specific knowledge gap, interim resources are useful at any level. This is particularly true for larger legal teams, where younger lawyers play a key role.
Instead of viewing contract resources for ad hoc needs, law firms can reap the economic benefits of leverage and cost management by incorporating contract attorneys as an integral part of their delivery strategy, particularly at junior levels.
Benefits include a flexible resourcing model to match service demand; pricing flexibility; reduction of the labor cost base; increased leverage (when work is won); and talent on a trial basis.
Benefits for Associates
While contract work was once seen as a last resort for attorneys who couldn't find a permanent role, more lawyers are realizing its unique advantages. Working on an interim or contract basis extends potentially significant benefits to young lawyers, including access to opportunities for a future permanent position and diverse training and development through a well-rounded work portfolio.
As their network of interim experience expands, younger lawyers can expand their professional coonections and network, and gain more confidence in client interactions.
Staying Future-Ready
Permanent staff will likely always be the backbone of a law firm. However, firms need more flexible delivery solutions if they're to ensure their continued success, faced with the current financial instability.
Integrating contract labour in its delivery model allows firms to be nimble in a changing market. This solution is not only economical and efficient; it empowers firms to meet clients' needs in a tailored way.
Providing contract services to law firms is also a rich opportunity for young lawyers exploring new options or, in the unfortunate event they've been laid off, a viable path back to the law firm world.
In light of anticipated economic difficulties, it's time to give serious consideration to some form of "just-in-time" resourcing practice, at scale—one that provides enormous benefits to both law firms and talented lawyers who are impacted by the current crisis.
Duc V. Trang and Anthony Graham are managing directors at legal recruitment firm Major, Lindsey & Africa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPallas Partners Founder On the Disputes Trends to Look Out For in 2025
4 minute readWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
- 2Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 3Lessons From Five Popular Change Management Concepts: A Guide for Law Firm Leaders in 2025
- 4People in the News—Jan. 15, 2025—Ballard Spahr, Brahin Law
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Stay Focused on Building Strong Relationships,' Says Joseph Yaffe of Skadden
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250