The Legal Sector Must Ensure COVID-19 Does Not Create More Barriers to Diversity
Tiernan Brady, global director of inclusion at Clifford Chance, says it is easy to have values in good times, but in challenging times we show whether our commitment to these values is real.
May 26, 2020 at 06:14 AM
6 minute read
Some say COVID-19 is the great social leveller that impacts us all equally. It just isn't true.
Across law firms and society more broadly the impacts of COVID-19 and how we have responded to it are having a profoundly different set of outcomes for different groups. If these impacts are left unaddressed they will further exacerbate barriers to building more inclusive workplaces and societies. The legal sector needs to be strategic and proactive in making sure that inclusion does not emerge as an additional victim in this terrible moment.
We can sadly, and clearly, see that at a medical level COVID-19 is having a disproportionate impact on people from certain ethnicities. This impact is further amplified in many countries by the poorer socio-economic outcomes for many of these populations. The legal sector needs to be thinking now how it can intervene to support these groups both within our firms and in society.
We need to understand and tackle the disproportionate impact it may have on access to schooling and university acceptances. Inclusion at its most basic level requires the absence of exclusion. This will not simply iron itself out as we eventually return to a new normal — it requires targeted and tailored interventions now.
We are not working from home. Working from home is when you get to avoid the office and your commute, schools are open, day care and wider family are available to assist you. That is not what is happening now.
Our work and personal lives have totally merged instantaneously and all in the middle of a global pandemic. All the old guidelines on how to work from home pale into insignificance in the face of this reality.
For LGBT+ people, many face the anxiety of having to move home and in doing so move back into the closet, not just into their old bedroom. We also know that far too many LGBT+ people feel they cannot be out at work so homes have had to be denuded of any signs that would give the game away on a video call or meeting with colleagues or clients.
It is the impact on our family lives that is probably most visible to all of us as we glide from one video conference to another. Many of us are raising children or taking care of elderly parents and other vulnerable family members. It is always lovely to see children bounce through a client call and we all laugh and genuinely enjoy it, but it belies the pressure that is being faced by so many as we try to balance everything in real time.
There is a significant threat that this crisis will also have a gendered impact as a result. We would like to think that we live in a perfect world where parenting and family duties are carried out equally but we shouldn't kid ourselves.
The demands of family will undoubtedly fall disproportionately on women. We can admire that problem and say it shouldn't be so but that won't change it. As the crisis and it's impact roll on through the year people will be faced with increasing choices between work and family. The anxiety that many feel already as they contemplate whether they should take extended leave and what impact will that have on their career is all too real.
Law firms and clients need to get ahead of this. Leadership teams need to tell their colleagues that they understand these pressures and will do everything in their power to support the choices people are faced with and that those choices will not be held against them at a later date.
There needs to be a new found understanding and flexibility with each other based on empathy and that simplest of values — kindness. No amount of guidelines will be as effective as the simple advice our grannies gave us to be nice to each other. It turns out that they are smarter than the best change management consultants for the needs of this moment.
There has been endless talk and seminars on the importance of inclusion, purpose and values in recent years. It is easy to have values in good times. It is only in challenging times that we show whether or not our commitment to these values is real. Inclusion is not a luxury item that can be put in a drawer until after a crisis. Values that we dismiss in times of crisis aren't values at all — they are merely fridge magnets or brand aware t-shirts.
Here's the thing — we employ smart people and they can easily tell the difference between a value and a slogan. If we truly believe what we profess on inclusion then we will understand now is when inclusion both faces serious challenges and provides key solutions to our way through this time.
Tiernan Brady is the global head of inclusion at Clifford Chance. He joined the firm in 2019 after serving as the executive director of the Equality Campaign, the successful Australian marriage equality campaign, before which he was the political director of Yes Equality, the successful Irish campaign for marriage equality.
|Read more
Closing the Gender Gap Must Remain a Law Firm Priority, Even in a Crisis
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readMexico's Judicial Reforms and the Implications for Foreign Investors
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
- 2How Have You Fared in 2024? Share Your Insights in the Managing Partners Survey
- 3Court Rules Mere Conduit Defense Not Suitable for a Motion to Dismiss
- 4Ironclad Officially Launches New Gen AI Assistant Jurist
- 5After Litigation with Ex-COO, Proskauer Fills Role
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250