Volkswagen Suffers Major Blow Following Landmark 'Dieselgate' Court Ruling
Germany's highest court delivered a ruling on Monday that all but ends Volkswagen's chances of limiting the reputational and financial damage done to the company over a five-year period.
May 26, 2020 at 01:54 PM
4 minute read
Germany's highest court ruled this week that Volkswagen must pay compensation to the owner of a secondhand VW van fitted with emissions-cheating software, paving the way for 60,000 related claims.
The landmark ruling means the carmaker is now required to take back the claimant's vehicle and pay him more than €28,000 ($30,700).
In 2015, Volkswagen admitted to having intentionally programmed diesel engines installed in millions of cars globally to skirt U.S. emissions standards.
The ruling, issued Monday, brings some finality to a scandal that has dogged the German carmaker for five years and has involved as many as 26 law firms. As the matter reaches a conclusion, some of the law firms involved in the case, including Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Pinsent Masons and Taylor Wessing, are expected to see their local earnings drop off, people close to the situation have said.
"The diesel complex has not fundamentally changed the legal market but it has brought an extraordinary volume of work for everyone," said Rupprecht Graf von Pfeil, a partner at Venturis Consulting Group, a law-firm strategy consulting company in Munich.
Law firms benefited from the large number of cases the German carmaker has racked up globally since Dieslegate broke in 2015. The company has spent roughly €1.7 billion ($1.9 billion) on Dieselgate-related legal representation and advice, according to a company representative.
VW owners in Germany were given the choice of joining the newly created Musterfeststellungsklage, a declaratory, or civil law collective action similar to a class action, or bringing individual suits against VW. The declaratory action allows qualified institutions, such as consumer organizations, to bring actions against companies to determine the validity of consumer claims against the company.
Last month, VW settled the German action, guaranteeing VW owners between €1,350 and €6,250 ($1,480-$6,860). Roughly 240,000 owners opted to accept the payment, costing the company approximately €750 million ($824 million).
Because not all owners joined the action, the company is left with roughly 60,000 claims to settle in Germany. Freshfields was hired by Volkswagen to handle the cases, while several other firms are helping settle cases as they arrive in Germany's lower and midlevel courts. These firms include Luther, a German firm based in Berlin, as well as U.K.-based Pinsent Masons and Taylor Wessing, and KPMG Law. Throughout the scandal, about 26 firms have been part of the German carmaker's legal team, a source close to the matter said.
Taylor Wessing said in a statement: "We employed the additional personnel required on the basis of fixed-term employment contracts that expire when the Diesel mandate is terminated. In the meantime, we have been able to recruit a large number of these colleagues for other areas. In this respect, too, we have benefited from the Diesel mandate."
Freshfields partners Patrick Schöder, Martina de Lind van Wijngaarden and Moritz Becker were tasked with coordinating the Volkswagen work, according to a person at the firm.
While a number of issues still have to be settled in court, including whether Volkwagen has to pay interest on the settlement amounts, Monday's ruling signals the beginning of the end of the Dieselgate proceedings.
"While it may take some time to settle all cases, an end is in sight," Venturis' Graf von Pfeil said.
But the carmaker's legal troubles do not end there. In June, the high court will resume hearing arguments over whether Volkswagen breached its duty to inform investors by withholding information about the Dieselgate scandal in the months before it became public in 2015. The case, which is slated to run through the end of the year, will deal with billions of euros in damages that investors say they suffered as a result of Volkswagen's delay in reporting its diesel troubles.
Volkswagen is being represented by Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz in that case.
Freshfields and Pinsent Masons did not respond to requests for comment.
|
Read more
Former Hausfeld Partner Establishes Litigation Funder in Germany
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Racial Discrimination Complaint Triggered South African IT Probe
4 minute readHogan Lovells Takes Partner Quartet, Hiring from Dechert, Ashurst in Singapore
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 2The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 3November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 4Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
- 5How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250