Slater & Gordon Working From Home: How Will it Work?
Former lawyers raise concerns about the UK plan, but the firm insists: "We won't expect our people to hop on a busy Central Line for work."
May 29, 2020 at 08:38 AM
4 minute read
When news broke that Slater & Gordon would not renew its lease on its London office and would instead set up all its London staff to work remotely, some were skeptical.
The Anglo-Australian firm announced on Wednesday that once the lease for its Holborn office expires in September, it will be looking to move to a more flexible office and will encourage its workforce to work from home "for the majority of the time".
But one former lawyer said: "I just wonder if something is lost when you don't have an opportunity for people to have a collegiate working environment. Law can be a bit lonely. It's just something quite different when you're only based at home.
"There's a lot of networking involved in law: a lot of lunches, breakfasts and going to events. Does that go by the wayside? And are [junior lawyers] really going to get the training from wherever they live?"
The firm will operate with a smaller London office premises that will be used primarily for meetings, although it is unclear whether this will be in place by the time the September lease comes to an end.
On Friday, the firm's chief people officer, Alicia Alinia, responded to the comments, saying: "We are moving towards a flexible culture. During this lockdown period, we took into account the demographics of our staff, what they needed and what we could provide to them. If they needed more screens, desks, chairs, etc., we delivered it to them. Working from home made us realise: 'Actually, I don't need to be seen at work for my manager to know that I'm working.'
"The new office will be designed for meeting space. It won't be somewhere where you store things, and we encourage people to come in for a real purpose such as team-building and meeting their colleagues and/or clients, as opposed to expecting to see traditional 9am to 5pm employee presenteism in the office. We won't expect our people to hop on a busy Central Line for work. Everyone just learns to manage their time better, and we'll become a much more output-driven business."
Throughout the lockdown, the firm has kept skeleton staff in its digital post room to print or scan documents and send them to fee-earners, and will continue to support its lawyers that way but, according to Alinia, the firm will review its use of technology as it evolves to better support its lawyers later on.
She added that throughout the lockdown, the firm had seen their internal engagement and productivity go up. She said that the firm's Manchester and Liverpool offices "have felt more engaged than ever before" thanks to virtual bi-weekly events, and other virtual socialising events.
Alinia added: "Working from places where your talent is the most productive is the way forward. It's not about policy anymore, it's about culture. Millenials want to choose to come into an office for a real purpose. Mothers coming back from maternity leave, who would previously often be worried about asking for more flexible work schedules, don't have to worry about that anymore. Remote working is encouraging for a diverse workforce."
The firm has put in place a virtual induction process for its junior lawyers throughout the lockdown, and created a virtual learning supervisory environment. Moving forward, it will look to ensure that trainees and apprentices will still get a mix of face to face training whilst also remote-working.
Alinia said: "How much more can you get out of trainees if you have a flexible working environment and provide the work-life balance they so heavily demand?"
|
Read more:
Welcome to the Law Firm Office of the Future: Smaller, Higher-Tech and One-Way
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Greenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250