DLA Piper Offers Future Trainees Up to £10K To Defer Start Dates
The firm will give future U.K. trainees grants for voluntarily delaying contracts by six months or a whole year.
June 05, 2020 at 06:21 AM
4 minute read
DLA Piper is offering thousands of pounds to future trainees who voluntarily defer the start date of their training contracts as part of the latest measures by the firm in light of the coronavirus pandemic.
The firm is offering future trainees three choices regarding the start date of their contracts. They have the option to start as normal in August; defer by six months until February 2021 and receive a £5,000 grant; or delay by a whole year and start in August 2021 in return for a £10,000 grant.
The options apply to all future trainees in the UK's London and regional offices.
The financial measures are the latest taken by the firm in response to the coronavirus pandemic. In May, the firm began offering its international workforce options to reduce hours and pay as part of two flexible working schemes.
The previous month, DLA Piper also confirmed it had put a number of its non fee-earning staff on furlough.
As well as offering future trainees money for voluntary deferrals, the firm has also moved its summer vacation scheme online to a virtual platform. Many other firms including Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Clifford Chance and White & Case have made similar moves.
In a statement, Liam Cowell, DLA's UK managing partner, said: "In line with many other law firms, we are preparing for a gradual and voluntary return to offices over the next few months, and as such, are offering all our new trainees a similar gradual approach by phasing our dates to start their careers at DLA Piper.
"Fostering an environment that is supportive and collaborative is central to our values as a firm, and with this staggered approach we will be able to offer our intake the very best in-person training experience, even during these challenging times."
One person with knowledge of the measures added that it was "not a money-saving exercise", saying: "The issue we've got is that as we gradually introduce people back into the workplace over a couple of months, what we don't want to end up doing is actually having a pretty small number of people in the offices and a load of trainees who will be like 'well, who am I sitting with, what am I supposed to be doing' all that kind of thing.
"So we're just trying to make sure it's phased so that people are introduced back into the workplace and get the best kind of training experience that they possibly can."
The news was first reported on the Legal Cheek website.
The move comes as various firms grapple with how to handle their trainee intakes at a time when transactional activity has fallen and everyone is working remotely. Large firms including Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters and Slaughter and May have all confirmed they are not planning to defer their incoming trainees.
But DWF and Irwin Mitchell, which are among those delaying their August intakes till February 2021 and Squire Patton Boggs and AIM-listed Gateley have yet to decide.
Commenting on deferrals in general, one London-based private equity partner said he would ask to defer if he was an incoming trainee at a firm as the first training seat is "all about face to face transactions".
Read more
Large UK Firms Maintain 2020 Trainee Intake as Mid-Tier Wavers
Slaughters and A&O Join Swathe Of Firms Going Virtual For Vac Schemes
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Greenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250