Gary Senior Fined, Avoids Being Banned From Profession
The case relates to historical allegations of inappropriate behaviour by Senior and the internal investigation by the matter into his former firm, Baker McKenzie.
June 12, 2020 at 09:45 AM
3 minute read
Former Baker McKenzie London head Gary Senior has been fined £55,000 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal but not banned from working in the legal profession.
He has also agreed to pay costs of £40,000 plus VAT to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which brought the case, his QC said.
The ruling on Friday afternoon by the U.K. regulatory body is related to Senior's behaviour towards a junior colleague in 2012 and the subsequent investigation into the matter.
On Friday morning, the tribunal found on Friday morning that Senior had committed serious professional misconduct in the incident with a junior lawyer, and in seeking to improperly influence the internal investigation into the matter in 2012. However, the panel of judges did not find Senior guilty of failing to report himself to the regulator.
The hearing, which originally started in December saw Senior standing accused of sexual harassment perpetrated on a junior associate in 2012.
Baker McKenzie, its former head of dispute resolution Tom Cassels, as well as former head of human resources Martin Blackburn, were all accused of having allegedly mishandled the internal investigation into the matter at the time.
The panel of judges decided on Friday that all the allegations against the firm, Cassels and Blackburn, were left unproved.
Baker McKenzie's lawyer, Patricia Robertson QC, said that the firm was asking the tribunal to order the SRA to pay its costs of up to £304,000, covering a period from mid-April until June 12.
She said on Friday that it was unreasonable for the regulator to have continued the case against the firm after the hearing was adjourned in December 2019, which was due to one of the defendants being unable to attend. Lawyers for Cassels have also asked for the SRA to pay his entire costs.
The SRA, meanwhile, is looking for Bakers to pay its own costs of an unspecified amount.
The tribunal will reconvene on June 15 to accept further costs applications from the lawyers representing Blackburn.
The hearing ended last month with revelations that the Senior matter had previously been reported to the regulator in 2015.
Gary Senior said in a statement provided on his behalf: "I bitterly regret what happened in 2012. The matter was not covered up by the firm in 2012. An investigation was carried out by the firm involving a number of senior partners.
"At the time I believed I behaved appropriately in that investigation while cooperating with them and no comment to the contrary was made to me by those conducting the process. I cannot make any further comment until I have studied the Tribunal's reasons for deciding as they have, as they did not give any reasons for their decision today."
Read more:
Gary Senior Was Set to Become Gender Champion as Investigation Unfolded, Tribunal Hears
Gary Senior Admits Harassment, But Denies 'Micro-Managing' Investigation
Gary Senior Investigators 'Betrayed Their Colleagues', Baker McKenzie London Head Claimed
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readIsraeli Firm Pearl Cohen Combines with San Francisco IP Boutique
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250