Gary Senior Found to Have Committed Serious Misconduct
The UK's Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has found that the former Baker McKenzie London chief acted inappropriately towards a junior in 2012.
June 12, 2020 at 06:18 AM
4 minute read
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has found that Baker McKenzie's former London head Gary Senior committed serious professional misconduct with his actions towards a junior colleague in 2012 and improperly seeking to influence the investigation and its outcome.
A panel of three judges at the U.K. industry disciplinary body delivered their decisions on Friday. The panel ruled that the evidence given in the tribunal proved that he had behaved in an inappropriate manner towards the complainant, Person A, and knew he was in a position of authority.
The judges are set to announce any sanctions later on Friday.
The tribunal had previously heard Senior agree that his behaviour towards the lawyer, including asking her to stay behind in his hotel room, paying her a compliment and moving towards her to kiss her, was "totally inappropriate".
Senior has agreed to pay costs of £40,000 plus VAT to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which brought the case, his QC said.
A spokesperson for Senior provided a statement on his behalf: "I bitterly regret what happened in 2012. The matter was not covered up by the firm in 2012. An investigation was carried out by the firm involving a number of senior partners. At the time I believed I behaved appropriately in that investigation while cooperating with them and no comment to the contrary was made to me by those conducting the process. I cannot make any further comment until I have studied the Tribunal's reasons for deciding as they have, as they did not give any reasons for their decision today."
But others accused in the case were found not guilty of misconduct. The panel found that former Baker McKenzie head of dispute resolution, Tom Cassels, "made errors of judgment" in the manner in which Senior's misconduct was dealt with, but his errors of judgment did not amount to professional misconduct on his part.
The tribunal also found that Martin Blackburn, who was the former head of human resources throughout this incident in 2012, was not a decision-maker in the decisions made in regards to Senior and he had clearly relegated the investigation to Cassels.
Baker McKenzie was cleared of claims that it failed to promptly report Senior's misconduct to the regulator.
In a statement Baker McKenzie said: "The firm has co-operated fully with the SRA throughout this process. We are pleased that no finding of professional misconduct has been made against Baker McKenzie.
"We are a different firm from a decade ago with new leadership, an enhanced purpose and a commitment to diversity and inclusion. This is reflected by the actions we have taken and policies we have introduced that ensure that all of our people, regardless of seniority, feel empowered to call out wrong or inappropriate behaviour. Following this incident, we have also enhanced our internal policies, including around corporate governance. Something like this must never happen again."
The decisions come after a tumultuous hearing, which originally started in December. Senior stood accused of sexual harassment perpetrated on a junior associate in 2012. Baker McKenzie, its former head of dispute resolution Tom Cassels, as well as former head of human resources Martin Blackburn, were all accused of having allegedly mishandled the internal investigation into the matter at the time.
The hearing ended last month with revelations that the Senior matter had previously been reported to the regulator in 2015.
|Read More:
Gary Senior Was Set to Become Gender Champion as Investigation Unfolded, Tribunal Hears
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250