Which Law Firms Have the Most Black Lawyers in the UK?
A survey of the 50 largest firms lays bare the shockingly low levels of racial diversity in the UK legal industry.
June 12, 2020 at 04:42 AM
5 minute read
Cooley, Clifford Chance and Latham & Watkins have the highest proportion of black lawyers in the U.K. according to research that lays bare the lack of racial diversity within the profession.
A survey of the 50 largest law firms by Law.com International found Cooley topped the table, with five of its 113 U.K. lawyers saying they are black. Other firms that ranked highly were Ashurst, Ropes & Gray, Shoosmiths and Sidley Austin.
The firms stand out as the few where black lawyers make up at 2% or more of their total U.K. lawyer population. At most of the 39 firms that provided any information about ethnicity around 1% of lawyers disclosed their ethnicity as black. Three per cent of the population in England and Wales is black.
Not all lawyers at the firms disclosed their ethnicity, meaning there could be some black lawyers not recorded in the data. At 20 of the top 25 firms the disclosure rate was 80% or higher.
The figures make for grim reading for campaigners at a time when they are calling for institutions such as law firms to take a stand against racism and improve their diversity in light of Black Lives Matter protests going on around the world.
Justin Stock, Cooley's London managing partner, said in a statement: "While a statistic may say that we are leading on our proportion of black lawyers in London as compared to others in the industry, we are not satisfied.
"These low numbers across the board reflect that we and other firms still have a long way to go to ensuring black lawyers have equal opportunity to succeed within Big Law. We are deeply committed to increasing our own proportion of black lawyers, both in the London market and across the firm, to actively listening to our black lawyers to hear their concerns and shape firm strategy that takes their experiences into consideration, and to effecting further and necessary permanent change."
Even fewer black lawyers have made it to partnership level. Of the 33 firms that offered information, almost two thirds said they had no black partners in their U.K. offices. They included the likes of Allen & Overy, Baker McKenzie, Clyde & Co, CMS and Pinsent Masons.
Vinson & Elkins had the highest proportion of black partners with 6.25%, which amounts to one of its 16 U.K. partners. The firm with the most black partners was Eversheds Sutherland, with two out of 304 in the U.K.
The research also demonstrated the low levels of transparency on the topic by many firms. Out of 50 firms taking part in a wider diversity survey, 11 refused to disclose any ethnicity data for their U.K. lawyers. These included: Kirkland & Ellis and Weil Gotshal & Manges.
Of the remaining 39 firms, several, including Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughter and May, said they were unable to provide a number for black lawyers only and they were categorised alongside Asian and other ethnic minorities.
Other firms declined to provide an overall percentage of black lawyers or claimed GDPR prevented them from disclosing such information, while some said they did not record ethnicity data outside of their U.S. offices.
The numbers appear to be worse among the largest U.K. legal institutions than at smaller practitioners. According data from a wider survey by the Solicitors Regulation Authority in 2019, 3% of all U.K. lawyers are black.
The revelation comes as law firms have been responding to the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man, after being restrained by a white policer officer in Minneapolis, U.S. In light of his passing, protests have been taking place all over the world to denounce systemic racism and police brutality.
Several law firms donated to various organizations promoting racial justice and the abolition of systemic racism. Clifford Chance issued 'a call to action for racial equality', and was among several to pledge $100,000 or more to equality initiatives. Others who took action included Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Weil Gotshal & Manges, Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, and Allen & Overy.
|
Read more:
When #BlackLivesMatter Calls For Urgent Change, It's Looking at Law Firms Too
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 2Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 3Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 4De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 5Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250