For In-House Junior Lawyers, It's Never Been Busier
The pandemic has left junior lawyers exposed to more varied and interesting work.
June 15, 2020 at 08:23 AM
5 minute read
Most lawyers have had to put their careers on pause as economic activity falters during the lockdown. But for one group they have never been busier.
Junior lawyers working in-house would normally be spending their time on basic matters with oversight from more senior colleagues. Now they have thrust into advising on the top-level advisory work as general counsel take on a wider variety of tasks and companies look to keep their costs down.
The situation is so extreme that some law firms are taking their time to explain things to junior lawyers without a charge, according to one general counsel at a media company.
"I'm doing work I never expected I would because of COVID-19", said one general counsel. "The work I'd usually do is what I have pushed downwards."
"My speciality area is where my junior team don't have that expertise, so I've focused on this particularly and the new sense of responsibility is growing their skill set."
The general counsel added the increased responsibility for juniors means legal teams need to "provide support to make that work and carve out time to do it as you've lost the ease of supervision you get working together in an office".
"The work I'd usually do is what I have pushed downwards."
Other legal heads echoed this shift in responsibilities. One general counsel at a digital bank said the huge uptick in work has stretched their legal team's capacity, particularly because of the nature of the work.
"It's not business as usual", he said, "it's over and above, and quite technical".
He outlined that the issues now being taken on by junior lawyers – and the majority of in-house teams - are challenging because there is often no right or wrong answer, and there are many legal, regulatory and conduct considerations to make.
Simon Harper, co-founder of alternative legal service provider LOD, agreed that the type of work trickling down to junior lawyers is typically more towards genuine contract expertise, according to feedback from clients. "[We're] finding that experienced paralegals are being used more and more for in house contract drafting and negotiation", he said.
"This not only means that clients get their lower value contracts done in an efficient way but that junior professionals get access to varied and meaningful work where they can add great value."
Not necessarily a bad thing
But throwing juniors in at the deep end is not necessarily a bad thing, according to the general counsel at a travel company, who even before the pandemic had a philosophy of giving junior lawyers work that would take them out of their comfort zone.
The GC said the team is currently supporting a junior lawyer through an M&A transaction, but stressed this isn't solely down to the pandemic. They try to offer more responsibilities in order to maintain better retention rates and better performance.
"It's on the GC to trust and grow junior lawyers – either doing it themselves or ensuring their team are empowered to do it".
Similarly, one London-based corporate partner said that GCs are often doing more with less and do not have infinite budgets, so this expansion of junior lawyer role - even if temporary – will be beneficial as their teams will be well-trained.
He added, however, that while firms strive for their junior lawyers and trainees to be busy and challenged, the less sophisticated work is a part of every deal and "somebody needs to do it".
Few expect a permanent transformation of the junior lawyer role. "It's a short-term reaction to a stress point which is causing different types of issues and all at the same time", said the digital bank GC.
Yet, one bank GC said she'd be open to things continuing this way if she saw lawyers stepping up, noting it will "add to their kudos in the business and career". She added that "most lawyers are diligent" so there's no reason why they shouldn't take on more.
"They should get some good learning experiences out of it", they added.
|Read More:
How to Be the Only Woman in the Boardroom – By Those Who Have Been There
Have a few minutes to spare? Take the Legal Week job satisfaction survey and tell us your thoughts on working life at your firm. Click here to take the questionnaire and enter the prize draw, all submissions are strictly anonymous.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAre More Canadian Lawyers Bailing on Big Law to Found Their Own Firms?
4 minute readIs Saudi Arabia's Khoshaim & Associates' Abu Dhabi Debut a Harbinger of Change?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 3Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Latham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250