For In-House Junior Lawyers, It's Never Been Busier
The pandemic has left junior lawyers exposed to more varied and interesting work.
June 15, 2020 at 08:23 AM
5 minute read
Most lawyers have had to put their careers on pause as economic activity falters during the lockdown. But for one group they have never been busier.
Junior lawyers working in-house would normally be spending their time on basic matters with oversight from more senior colleagues. Now they have thrust into advising on the top-level advisory work as general counsel take on a wider variety of tasks and companies look to keep their costs down.
The situation is so extreme that some law firms are taking their time to explain things to junior lawyers without a charge, according to one general counsel at a media company.
"I'm doing work I never expected I would because of COVID-19", said one general counsel. "The work I'd usually do is what I have pushed downwards."
"My speciality area is where my junior team don't have that expertise, so I've focused on this particularly and the new sense of responsibility is growing their skill set."
The general counsel added the increased responsibility for juniors means legal teams need to "provide support to make that work and carve out time to do it as you've lost the ease of supervision you get working together in an office".
"The work I'd usually do is what I have pushed downwards."
Other legal heads echoed this shift in responsibilities. One general counsel at a digital bank said the huge uptick in work has stretched their legal team's capacity, particularly because of the nature of the work.
"It's not business as usual", he said, "it's over and above, and quite technical".
He outlined that the issues now being taken on by junior lawyers – and the majority of in-house teams - are challenging because there is often no right or wrong answer, and there are many legal, regulatory and conduct considerations to make.
Simon Harper, co-founder of alternative legal service provider LOD, agreed that the type of work trickling down to junior lawyers is typically more towards genuine contract expertise, according to feedback from clients. "[We're] finding that experienced paralegals are being used more and more for in house contract drafting and negotiation", he said.
"This not only means that clients get their lower value contracts done in an efficient way but that junior professionals get access to varied and meaningful work where they can add great value."
Not necessarily a bad thing
But throwing juniors in at the deep end is not necessarily a bad thing, according to the general counsel at a travel company, who even before the pandemic had a philosophy of giving junior lawyers work that would take them out of their comfort zone.
The GC said the team is currently supporting a junior lawyer through an M&A transaction, but stressed this isn't solely down to the pandemic. They try to offer more responsibilities in order to maintain better retention rates and better performance.
"It's on the GC to trust and grow junior lawyers – either doing it themselves or ensuring their team are empowered to do it".
Similarly, one London-based corporate partner said that GCs are often doing more with less and do not have infinite budgets, so this expansion of junior lawyer role - even if temporary – will be beneficial as their teams will be well-trained.
He added, however, that while firms strive for their junior lawyers and trainees to be busy and challenged, the less sophisticated work is a part of every deal and "somebody needs to do it".
Few expect a permanent transformation of the junior lawyer role. "It's a short-term reaction to a stress point which is causing different types of issues and all at the same time", said the digital bank GC.
Yet, one bank GC said she'd be open to things continuing this way if she saw lawyers stepping up, noting it will "add to their kudos in the business and career". She added that "most lawyers are diligent" so there's no reason why they shouldn't take on more.
"They should get some good learning experiences out of it", they added.
Read More:
LOD Launches In-House-Only Legal Service to UK Market
'Incredibly Tough Right Now': GCs Struggle to Maintain Work-Life Balance
How to Be the Only Woman in the Boardroom – By Those Who Have Been There
Have a few minutes to spare? Take the Legal Week job satisfaction survey and tell us your thoughts on working life at your firm. Click here to take the questionnaire and enter the prize draw, all submissions are strictly anonymous.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss Says Progress Means 'Embracing the Uncomfortable Reality'
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 2Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 3DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
- 4'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
- 5'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250