Conflict Fears Raised Over HSF Role on FCA COVID-19 Review
An advisory firm has called on HSF to disclose its insurance and broker clients given its advisory role for the UK regulator.
June 17, 2020 at 10:14 AM
3 minute read
An insurance advisory firm has called on Anglo-Australian firm Herbert Smith Freehills to show it is not conflicted in its role advising the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in a review of COVID-19 insurance claims.
HSF is advising the U.K. finance industry regulator on its intentions to seek a High Court review of policies after a large number of claims were rejected during the Covid-19 lockdown.
Mactavish, which acts as a specialist outsourced insurance buyer and claims resolution expert, has called on HSF to disclose if it also represents any of the insurers or brokers whose wordings will be subject to scrutiny.
In a statement, the advisory firm added that "if that is the case it is difficult to see how conflicts of interest would not arise".
Mactavish said it believes that there is a public interest in this disclosure "because the FCA, which will presumably be paying their fees, is funded by the taxpayer and was set up to be an independent body to protect the interests of consumers".
As part of a statement on the matter, it also called on the regulator to run a more "in-depth review" of the role played by brokers around failed Covid-19 business interruption (BI) claims.
Bruce Hepburn, CEO at Mactavish said in the statement that the insurance industry "is riddled with conflicts between insurers, brokers and law firms".
He said: "For there to be complete confidence in its current legal case of BI insurance claims linked to Covid-19, and for any future reviews of the sector, we believe the FCA needs to be completely transparent about its processes, and which partners it chooses to work with and why."
"The FCA is currently working with Herbert Smith Freehills on its court case review of BI claims. We believe the law firm has close relationships with many insurers and/or brokers. It may have advised on the very wordings being tested by the Court. In the spirit of transparency those insurers and brokers should agree that their identities should be disclosed to demonstrate there is no risk of any conflict of interest arising."
HSF responded: "As you would expect, we have a robust global conflicts procedure in place. There is no conflict of interest here."
The FCA added: "We are very clear that there is no conflict of interest and the claims made are unfounded. We have engaged three highly respected QCs from a number of different chambers alongside Herbert Smith Freehills. The FCA is seeking to ensure that we can get clarity in this case as soon as possible."
|
Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Lawyers Picked by Trump For Key Roles in His Second Term
- 2Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 3Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 4Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
- 5FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250