French Delivery Firm DPD Triumphs in COVID-19 Safety Case
Gide Loyrette Nouel advised DPD through the process, during which the company was able to continue its operations after proving it had taken measures to protect and consult with workers.
June 17, 2020 at 10:49 AM
3 minute read
DPD Group, a major European parcel delivery service part-owned by the French post office, has prevailed in a worker health and safety case brought by the French labor inspectorate over conditions at DPD's French facilities during the COVID-19 crisis.
Gide Loyrette Nouel advised DPD France in the case, which began on April 29 and ended June 11 with a French court's dismissal of the labor inspectorate's complaint.
DPD was able to continue its operations in France throughout the coronavirus lockdown after proving to the court that it had taken appropriate measures to protect workers and had consulted with worker representatives throughout the process, Gide said in a statement.
"DPD and the unions were on the same side of the case," said Guillaume Navarro, an employment law partner at Gide, who led the team advising DPD. "They worked together to change the way they worked every day and were able to demonstrate that to the court.
"As a result, DPD's delivery operations, which were essential during the crisis, could continue uninterrupted," Navarro said.
DPD is a pan-European company with operations in France, Germany and the U.K. Its French operations employ 2,100 workers and handle 320,000 parcels per day; it posted group annual revenue of €7.8 billion in 2019, according to its website.
On April 24, a French appeals court upheld a lower court ruling against Amazon France in a complaint brought by Amazon's unions. The lower court ordered Amazon France to limit its business to essential goods while it consulted with workers over health and safety measures or face heavy fines. Amazon closed its French operations rather than risk the fines; it resumed operations May 19.
DPD benefited from the Amazon rulings to craft its response to the labor inspectorate, Navarro said.
The company and its unions met two to three times a week to review safety measures and ended up implementing practices that went beyond government guidance, Navarro said. For example, he said, DPD required workers to wear masks in instances where physical distancing could not be observed even before the government required it.
In its ruling, the Judicial Court in Evry, outside Paris, noted that the health of DPD's personnel "had been duly taken into account and that efforts had been undertaken to reinforce coordination within the company and with its subcontractors following joint work sessions and thus ensure the safety of its personnel and premises."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoctors and Scientists Lead Climate Protests at Each Magic Circle Firm
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250