'A Whole New Type of Stressor': Two Junior UK Lawyers On Navigating Their Careers in Lockdown
In the latest is our Legal Life in Lockdown series, junior lawyers espouse the importance of exercise and discuss their experiences with online courts.
June 17, 2020 at 04:00 AM
5 minute read
As the U.K. lockdown due to COVID-19 continues, two lawyers at U.K. firms share their experience of it and tips on how they have managed to cope working from home so far. Megan Lafferty is an associate at Clyde & Co., and Emma Dyson is a senior solicitor at Brodies.
How have you adjusted to working remotely?
Emma: I was working from home one or two days a week prior to lockdown so the change wasn't so drastic for me. I think the first difficulty for many firms was getting everyone set up working remotely and once that was done, there were other issues to address. I have found there are some days where you feel that you can't be nearly as productive as you would like to be, but at the same time, I am also embracing the slower pace of life. It won't last forever!
Megan: I also had some experience working from home every so often, but usually with a house to myself. It was definitely an adjustment to find a rhythm that works well for me in terms of taking breaks and not being glued to a screen all day. I also had to source a desk, which was apparently as high in demand as pasta in the early weeks of lockdown.
What works?
Emma: I had a virtual appeal hearing in April which went wonderfully well with both counsel, the court and clients on a video conference. The Scottish courts are starting now to deal with the backlog of work and assigning telephone conferences and video meetings to handle hearings where appropriate. I think that does assist you to keep momentum with various actions. At my firm, we have also utilised Microsoft Teams to emulate our "Friday post-work drinks" which is a great way to stay in touch with your colleagues.
Megan: My team has a weekly meeting which we've maintained via Zoom. It has been really helpful touching base with my team on a regular basis as it can feel quite isolated working in lockdown alone. The courts are also making progress in getting civil work back up and running. I've had an increase in motions being dealt with over the past couple of weeks which is helping in terms of progressing existing litigated actions.
What is challenging?
Emma: Initially there was some uncertainty and inconsistency with how the courts were treating ongoing actions. The court continued to issue guidance regularly which then assisted us to have some idea of how actions might progress and to advise clients. The other issue was the fact that government guidance and legislation was developing and changing almost daily, and staying on top of the advice for clients was important. There is also just the general fatigue that comes with lockdown and some days you feel more motivated than others!
Megan: I had a virtual hearing in a regulatory case, which in the end went well. However, we did have some technical difficulties, which was a whole new type of stressor. Losing connection in the course of your opponent's submissions, for example, then trying to log back in, was something I wouldn't have been concerned about in the usual course of proceedings.
What are your coping mechanisms?
Emma: I think it is really important to have down-time away from your desk and screen at regular intervals. I have a scruffy little rescue dog who needs to be walked at least twice a day so that makes me get out and about, no matter the weather. On top of that, I have been making sure I always have something really delicious to look forward to eating for dinner every day!
Megan: Keeping in touch with colleagues, clients, friends and family has really made a difference, although I will be glad of the day I don't have to do another zoom quiz! I've also found taking an hour-long lunch break to do an exercise class in my living room or go outside, and to eat away from a computer screen, helps with the feeling of a normal routine.
Both Megan Lafferty and Emma Dyson are members of a branch of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) for members with less than 5 years' PQE.
|Read More:
Legal Life In Lockdown: A Telecoms GC On Starting His New Role Remotely
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Travers Smith's AI Training, Development Efforts
From Olympic Aspirations to Legal Innovation: Tom Dunlop's Journey to Founding Summize
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250