Summer Holiday? 'No Way,' Say UK Lawyers
One partner worries this will be 'a further push in the direction of working all year round'.
June 22, 2020 at 03:45 AM
4 minute read
The U.K. legal industry's traditional summer lull will all but disappear this year according to several top partners who say pandemic working practices have wiped out the possibility of a normal holiday season altogether.
One capital markets partner at a Magic Circle law firm said the historical practice of lawyers mirroring investors by doing less work between Bastille Day (July, 14) and September 1 had "gone" and that transactions will be completed throughout July and August this year.
They added it is a "further push in the direction of working all year round" for the legal industry.
A restructuring partner at another U.K. top 50 firm echoed this sentiment, commenting that the next few months "won't be like any summer before". He put this down to the fact that work is taking twice as long, so traditional completion timelines have been "kicked out".
He added that because time and work-life balance has become so blurred in this new remote-working era, clients may not necessarily be expecting lawyers to be taking a summer break anyway.
"There will be a break of some sort but I do genuinely think it will be a working break."
The restructuring partner also predicts a bumper 2020, with the "vast majority of work" coming in autumn where "the real impact on the economy will be felt".
A corporate M&A partner agreed that deals will likely go through in the summer months, particularly given that the change in M&A as a result of the pandemic has been "stark". As the slowdown in work has happened earlier this year, he thinks lawyers will likely want to crack on with deals where they can. Commenting on the M&A market more widely, he says "it will be a gentle climb" to recovery.
He also expects any holidays to be working holidays, saying: "If you're on holiday and you have your gadgets with you, there's no reason why you can't complete a deal."
The lull has already been and gone for the majority of firms, a finance partner at a U.S. firm in London notes. He says that the first month of lockdown inevitably meant a period of "firefighting" for law firms, but a natural quiet period followed soon after.
That period is well and truly over, he says. "The drum beat is noticeably getting faster. I don't know when that wall of problems which need to get sorted will hit us, but it seems to be starting now. It won't wait for people – so it could well be August."
And the problems aren't waiting for in-house lawyers either. One financial services general counsel says there is "no way" the summer period will be quiet.
"General counsel are wearing a ridiculous number of hats at the moment", they add. "I would love a lull but it won't happen".
"Even if we do manage to go on holiday, it's not like I'm not going to work."
But lawyers in some practice areas are still hoping for a normal summer break. One tax litigation partner said it's very much business as usual. "It's normally quiet for litigation in August and I suspect this year will be the same."
It seems that law firms were always alive to the likelihood of an August revival of the market. Fieldfisher asked staff to take 25% of their annual leave by June, while Big Four accounting firm EY asked for 35% of annual leave by the end of July, and 70% by the end of August.
The change appears similar to a shift taking place in France. Several lawyers in Paris have said a desire to catch up on work means the legal industry will have shorter vacations, working vacations, or no vacations at all.
Have a few minutes to spare? Take the Legal Week job satisfaction survey and tell us your thoughts on working life at your firm. Click here to take the questionnaire and enter the prize draw, all submissions are strictly anonymous.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Get Your House in Order' SFO Warns Corporates, as UK Government Issues Long-Awaited Fraud Guidance
Are More Canadian Lawyers Bailing on Big Law to Found Their Own Firms?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250