Photo: Jason Doiy/ALMMcDermott Will & Emery Ends 13-Year China Alliance, Exits Asia
Winston & Strawn said it has formed a relationship with MWE China Law Offices, known in Chinese as Yuan Da Law Offices, now that its alliance with McDermott has ended.
June 23, 2020 at 04:52 PM
3 minute read
Chicago-based McDermott Will & Emery has ended a strategic alliance with its longtime China partner firm, a move that means it no longer has a physical presence in Asia.
The alliance, with a Shanghai-based law firm known as MWE China Law Offices, gave McDermott a unique ability to access a Chinese law practice without having a physical presence on the ground. Under Chinese law, foreign law firms in China are barred from practicing Chinese law. They are allowed to advise on China's legal environment but are not permitted to give Chinese legal opinions or appear in court.
With its McDermott alliance ending, MWE China Law Offices, known in Chinese as Yuan Da Law Offices, has formed a relationship with Winston & Strawn. Winston has offices in Shanghai and Hong Kong; it closed its Beijing and Taipei offices in 2017.
In a statement, McDermott said it had decided to end its strategic alliance in China in order to provide its clients with a broader sampling of expertise in the region.
"We will continue to work with Yuan Da when our clients' interests are best served by their highly ranked team of lawyers," the law firm said.
McDermott formed its exclusive alliance with MWE China Law Offices, which was founded by a group of lawyers who broke away from Shanghai-based AllBright Law Offices, in 2007. The team was then led by partners John Huang and Kevin Qian.
The exclusive alliance model was adopted by other firms following McDermott's success. In 2011, U.K. firm Pinsent Masons entered an alliance with Beijing-based Hesen Law Firm. That arrangement ended in 2017. More recently, McGuireWoods, in 2015, formed a similar alliance with Shanghai-based FuJae Partners, a Chinese firm launched by several former JunHe partners. Pinsent Masons also has its own office in Beijing, while McGuireWoods, like McDermott, does not have a representative office in China. FuJae, though, does not share McGuireWoods' branding as MWE China Law Offices does with McDermott's.
MWE China Offices had been integrated with the rest of McDermott despite being a legally independent entity. The Shanghai-based firm, whose specialties include compliance and white-collar defense, is one of the most profitable domestic firms in China. In 2018, it had $1.45 million in profits per equity partner, the highest among all Chinese firms ranked by Law.com International's China 45 report.
McDermott has enjoyed its own financial success, posting two consecutive years of double-digit revenue growth. In 2019, its profits per equity partner also surpassed $2 million.
Last year, the U.S. firm closed its Seoul office, its only representative office in Asia.
|
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Australia’s MinterEllison Loses More Partners From Canberra Practice
2 minute read
More Than 2 Dozen Lawyers Break Off From DLA Piper Affiliate in Brazil to Form New Firm
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The New Hybrid Legal Professional: Equal Parts Law and Business
- 2Norton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Material in Internal IT Probe
- 3'The Front Line of Regulating AI': Manatt's Brandon Reilly on CPPA's Move to Adopt New Data Broker and AI Rules
- 4Newsmakers: New Trial Attorney David Young Joins Reynolds Frizzell LLP
- 5The Political Rally as Media Genre
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
