Saudi Competition Law Watchdog Appoints First Ever Woman to Committee
It is among the most senior quasi-judicial appointments for a woman in the Kingdom.
June 26, 2020 at 07:18 AM
3 minute read
Campaigners are claiming a new victory in the battle to improve the status of professional women in Saudi Arabia, following the appointment of a woman to a position of judicial rank in the Kingdom, according to several people close to the matter.
Consumer protection regulator the General Authority for Competition (GAC) has selected Dr Arwa Al-Jalal as a member of the Committee for Review and Adjudication of Competition Law Violations, according to two senior lawyers at international law firms with knowledge of the matter, and social media updates by the Authority's governor, Dr Abdulaziz Al-Zoom.
Saudi Arabia updated 2004 legislation with the introduction of a new competition law in 2019, and gave the GAC a mandate to implement it.
Al-Jalal's appointment has been met with praise from equal rights campaigners and voices.
"Congratulations on the decision to appoint the first Saudi woman to a quasi-judicial position in the Kingdom," tweeted Shura Council (Consultative Assembly) member, Latifa Al-Shaalan—one of 30 women to have been appointed to the 150-member body since 2013.
The appointment comes four years after the East Province Administrative Appeals Court appointed its first female commercial arbitrator, Shaimaa Al-Jibran, despite objections from one of the parties.
Al-Jalal is an assistant professor in the Department of Private Law at King Saud University's Faculty of Law and Political Science, in Riyadh, according to a website profile.
Al-Jalal did not respond to requests for comment.
Set up in 2017, the General Authority for Competition (GAC), seeks to "promote and protect fair competition, and to combat monopolistic practices that affect legitimate competition."
Its latest communique, issued on January 21, said the Committee was taking action on cases of abuse of dominant market position, bid-rigging in the contracting sector, especially on government tenders, and potential violations by firms engaged in the manufacture and distribution of building materials, as well as the food processing industry.
King Salman and his administration have previously said they have little tolerance for corruption, and Saudi Arabia is tightening its oversight of business malpractice and corruption.
Set up in 2011, Saudi agency Nazaha (the Control and Anticorruption Authority) exists to fight abuse of public and other positions. Since late May, it said it had initiated 127 cases, the largest involving forgery, money laundering, accounting fraud, creation of shell companies, bribery, and SIM card fraud.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman won a measure of public support after placing several prominent government officials and businessmen under house arrest at a hotel in Riyadh in 2017, an anti-corruption measure said to have been initiated due to $100 billion of embezzlement in recent decades.
The GAC did not respond to a request for comment.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$14B Nippon US Steel Deal to be Blocked But Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Milbank’s Capital Markets Partner Leaves for China’s Han Kun in Hong Kong
EY Law Launches in Portugal, Targets 40 Lawyers by End of 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 2Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 3Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 4Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
- 5Sanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250