The NQ Pay Climbdown At A Glance
Firms have moved to cut NQ salaries, hold them steady or put off their decision until later in 2020.
June 26, 2020 at 07:37 AM
3 minute read
When Slaughter and May became the first major firm to announce it was cutting salaries for its 2020 newly qualified (NQ) lawyers, it set the mood for a climb-down from the traditional annual aggressive pay war of 2019.
Firms have broadly opted for three different strategies in the face of COVID-19 disruption: cutting junior salaries, holding them at 2019 rates, or deferring their decision. Here is a firm-by-firm guide to NQ salary decisions so far:
The Cutters
Slaughter and May became the first major firm to reduce, cutting its NQ salaries by £5,000 to £87,000 at the end of May.
Fellow Magic Circle firms Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance followed suit this month, the former cutting total compensation, including a bonus, from £100,000 to £94,500 while the latter cut its salary base rate by 10% to £90,000.
Other U.K. firms have followed suit including Hogan Lovells, which cut NQ pay by £5,000 to £85,000 in London, and by £2,000 to £46,000 in Birmingham.
Osborne Clarke also announced at the end of June that its incoming NQs would be subject to the firmwide 7% salary cut, bringing their salary down to just over £66,000 in London.
The Holders
While some firms have moved to cut their NQ salaries, others have remained resolute. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer became the first major player to confirm it was keeping its NQ salary rate at 2019 levels of £100,000.
Herbert Smith Freehills also confirmed NQ salaries would be held at £105,000, along with firms CMS and Pinsent Masons, which are keeping theirs at £73,000 and £72,500 respectively.
Meanwhile, a host of U.S. firms also said that NQ pay for their London lawyers would remain at 2019. Those so far to confirm this are Latham & Watkins at £143,000, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton at £133,000 and Morgan Lewis & Bockius at £115,000.
The Deferrers
The last group of firms have decided to defer their decision on NQ salary for the time being. These include top firms White & Case and the last of the Magic Circle to make its decision, Linklaters.
Norton Rose Fulbright is yet to announce whether it will change from its present rate of £87,000. Finally, U.S. firm Paul Hastings has confirmed it will not be cutting its NQ salary but is still deciding whether or not to increase it.
This article has been updated to show that Norton Rose has not yet made a decision regarding its NQ salary.
|Read More:
Norton Rose Makes Five Redundant As Osborne Clarke Cuts NQ Pay
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250