From Stonewall To George Floyd: What Lessons Can Be Learned For LGBTQ+ Allyship?
"Black people on their own cannot bring about the change they deserve because the racism they face is systemic," say two Trowers & Hamlins lawyers.
June 29, 2020 at 03:11 AM
5 minute read
Trowers & Hamlins partner Yetunde Dania and lawyer Julian Jarrett explain the importance of having allies to speak up on issues of inequality regarding race and sexuality within the legal industry, and say that this is a pivotal moment to go about improving the workplace environment for black and LGBT+ people.
The brutal eight minutes and 46 seconds it took to murder George Floyd has, quite rightfully, got the whole world talking about racism against black people and its eradication.
Black people on their own cannot bring about the change they deserve because the racism they face is systemic. This is because the subtleties in the racism black people face emanate from practices throughout society, be they social, commercial or institutional. Such racism results in black people being discriminated against, and being treated less favourably than white people when it comes to crucial issues such as criminal justice, employment, housing, healthcare, political power, education and so on.
It is evident from the global protests taking place that black people are not alone in their demand for fair treatment and equality of opportunity. Such acts of allyship are reminiscent of LGBTQ+ Pride marches, a timely comparison given June is LGBTQ+ Pride month.
LGBTQ+ Pride month is a time when the U.S. and countries across the world come together to commemorate the 1969 Stonewall Uprising. The Uprising was in response to a violent and unprovoked early morning police raid of the Stonewall Inn, New York, a popular bar for LGBTQ+ folk. A watershed in the history of LGBTQ+ people, Stonewall is considered to be the starting point of a movement fighting for social justice and equality for the LGBTQ+ community.
Every year since 1969 the Pride movement has expanded, Pride marches across the globe have grown to enormous numbers, marching against the discrimination and unfair treatment of LGBTQ+ people historically and which still exists today.
Pride marches are often over-subscribed, with many corporate and individual allies seeking to take part and make a show of LGBTQ+ allyship. There are debates about what constitutes "true" acts of allyship but the fundamental point that people "show up" for Pride is something the LGBTQ+ community have been able to count on by and large.
The term "Ally" is used to describe people who do not identify with a minority group, but acknowledge the discrimination they suffer, and seek to support them in way that will advance equality. For example, at Trowers & Hamlins our LGBTQ+ and Allies Network (one distinct network that is part of our diversity and inclusion inititative TrowersIncludes) incorporates allies in all its network activities, we see allies as integral to our work in raising awareness; promoting acceptance, and celebrating peoples' identities; and eradicating ignorance and bullying.
But when we look to undertake LGBTQ+ initiatives, from fundraising for and providing pro-bono advice to LGBTQ+ charities, running awareness raising events; or implementing a more inclusive recruitment strategy; it is impossible to make progress in this respect without the help of allies.
In the wake of George Floyd's murder and the global public outcry of the treatment of black people, allyship still feels like a relatively new concept in respect of outwardly helping to advance the equality of opportunity and fairness for black legal professionals.
But seeing how, as a concept, it has helped to shine a much needed lens on, and bring about change for LGTBQ+ legal professionals it is evident that White, Asian and Minority Ethnic people have a very important role to play in the advancement of black people at this time, the outcome of which will benefit us all.
George Floyd's murder is a shocking illustration of police brutality in the U.S., but it appears to have finally galvanised society to look at the wider systemic and institutional aspects of racism. The legal profession has more nuanced forms of discrimination which requires a tailored response from the sector which the promotion of allyship may help to address.
Surely it is time for the same enthusiasm, demonstrated by the sector and numbers of people involved in Pride initiatives, to be swung behind the black legal community; so that meaningful and lasting change can finally happen.
|Read More
"The Fear Of Being Discovered Was Crippling" – One Gay Man's Experience Of Being Out at Work
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readMexico's Judicial Reforms and the Implications for Foreign Investors
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250