'Pandemic Speed': Karen Linehan, Sanofi GC, on Managing the Risks of Vaccine Development
"Vaccine development is a long journey, and it's in everyone's interest to have a good outcome, not necessarily the quickest one," she says.
June 29, 2020 at 05:14 PM
3 minute read
As the quest for a COVID-19 vaccine intensifies, companies at the forefront of research need to grapple with complex legal issues at all stages of the work, from the science of creating a safe and effective vaccine to the logistics of distribution and the management of risk. Karen Linehan, executive vice president of legal affairs and general counsel of Sanofi, the French-based pharmaceutical giant, took time out recently to discuss how her team gets involved in her company's efforts to bring a COVID-19 vaccine to market.
Sanofi has a large presence and long track record in vaccines. What are the key issues in vaccine development and production that come immediately to your attention as general counsel?
Product liability. No vaccine is ever 100% effective, which is one reason why serious efforts to develop them take place on many levels, involving many players. In the context of COVID-19, much of this work is taking place on an expedited basis—"pandemic speed"—but that does not mean any relaxation of standards.
I also pay attention to force majeure. When you have a contract to produce hundreds of millions of doses of vaccine before you know when it will be ready, that is a risk. As a company, we know what it is like to go at-risk, and we are ready to do that.
What are some of the ways Sanofi, and other vaccine developers, mitigate risk?
Balancing risk and benefit is always a human judgment, and nobody goes it alone. There are well-developed partnerships on the national, regional and global levels to manage production and ensure equitable distribution. A crucial part of our work is drawing up the terms of our partnerships and looking for new ones.
Liability funds, such as the one in the United States [the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program], also help mitigate the risks of product liability litigation.
Communication has emerged as a critical issue in managing public expectations of when a COVID-19 vaccine could be available. How does the general counsel's office get involved?
As a company, we communicate on the importance of vaccination generally. One of the challenges in public health is people not getting routine vaccinations. We work closely with external affairs and our medical colleagues to get that message out, and that supports the effort to communicate about COVID.
When it comes to specific products, regulatory rules determine what we can say and when. That goes for communications with the public, by our public affairs and marketing teams, and with investors, which is handled by investor relations. We work closely with those teams to review statements and publications in advance.
The most important thing, legally and in general, is to be transparent. Vaccine development is a long journey, and it's in everyone's interest to have a good outcome, not necessarily the quickest one.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Law Firm of the Year: A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Managing Partner
5 minute readInside Travers Smith's AI Training, Development Efforts
From Olympic Aspirations to Legal Innovation: Tom Dunlop's Journey to Founding Summize
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250