Earnings at Law Firms in Australia Increase Despite COVID-19
Australia has been insulated, in part because of ongoing work from the fallout of last's years Royal Commission into the banking sector and because Australia has not been as badly affected by COVID-19 as other parts of the world.
June 30, 2020 at 03:19 PM
5 minute read
Australia's larger law firms are on track for another strong year, with earnings increasing despite the COVID-19 economic crisis.
Benchmarking data on revenue, hours worked and demand collected by Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor reveals that average fees worked for April and May this year were up a combined 5.4% compared with the previous year.
For the 11 months to the end of May, fees worked—a proxy for revenue—was up 8.1%.
Australia has been insulated, in part because of ongoing work from the fallout of last year's Royal Commission into the banking sector and because Australia has not been as badly affected by COVID-19 as the United States, said Joe Blackwood, senior thought leadership analyst at Thomson Reuters.
Demand for legal services in Australia had slowed in the fourth quarter of the financial year, April to June, from the previous three quarters, although overall, the year was still strong, he said. Data for June is not yet available.
"Firms in other markets would be ecstatic to achieve the 3% growth we have seen in Australia over the last two months, let alone the 7% we have seen thus far in financial year 2020," Blackwood said. "We expect, barring an extremely significant increase in expenditure in June, healthy growth in profitability metrics, including profit margins."
Large firms have said that while some practice areas, such as transactions, had slowed, the work they already had in the words continued. Additionally, Australian companies rushed to raise capital at the start of the COVID-19 crisis and sought more advice on workplace health and safety and employment law.
And in what Blackwood says could be a harbinger of a broader economic slowdown, insolvency and restructuring was the strongest practice area in April and May. Demand was up 20.3% in April from the year before and 18.2% in May.
Several Australian firms have indicated they have continued to perform well, despite the effects of the pandemic.
Norton Rose Fulbright Australian managing partner Alison Deitz said that while transactional work in recent months has been down, other areas, such as restructuring deals, have increased.
Overall, the novel coronavirus pandemic hasn't had much impact on the firm's billings from the current financial year, and Deitz expects the firm will see an increase in its revenue over the previous year.
Separately, Chinese-Australia firm King & Wood Mallesons has not needed to reduce staff hours, cut salaries or reduce partner drawdowns
The data also reveals that partners have been working more hours than associates. Typically, associates work more hours. For instance, in the April to June quarter of last year, partners worked an average of 95 hours per month while associates worked 101 hours.
However, in April and May of this year, partners worked an average of 102 hours, compared with 100 for associates.
Blackwood said a similar trend is emerging in the U.S. and suggested a couple of possible reasons.
"One reason firms have pointed to is an increase in demand for advisory work that requires partners to perform," he said.
"Another theory is that partners are simply funneling less work down to their associates, perhaps in anticipation of demand slowdowns as the year progresses. This way they can ensure they are hitting their billable hour goals despite downturns that may occur within the market itself."
He also noted that by working an average of seven more hours per month when compared with the final quarter of last year, the larger proportion of work done by the higher fee-commanding partners has resulted in a jump in worked rate growth.
Australia, which has a population of around 25 million, has seen just 7,765 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 104 deaths.
Cases have been declining, and social distancing restrictions have been lifted in most states, although a second surge of cases in the second most populous state of Victoria in recent days has resulted in the reintroduction of restrictions there, such as limiting family gathering numbers to five.
Law firms around the country have been reopening their offices, although many continue to take a cautious approach by giving staff the option of continuing to work at home and limiting the number of people in the office at any one time.
The IMF recently said the Australian economy will perform better than it had predicted near the start of the COVID-19 outbreak. In late June the global financial organization said it expects Australia's gross domestic product to contract by 4.5% this year, compared with its prediction in April of a 6.7% drop.
The IMF expects the rest of the world will suffer a 4.9% drop on average.
The Australian economy has been cushioned by generous government-funded wage subsidies for businesses that have suffered a revenue drop of 20% or more and by banks allowing homeowners to delay their home loan repayments. However, both of these measures are due to finish in September, raising questions about how the economy will continue to perform without that support.
At the same time that Australian firms' revenues were up, their overhead expenses were lower, according to the Peer Monitor data.
Staff pay was down 12.6% in April and May, with office expenses, marketing and business development, and recruiting all down by over 50%.
Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor is a legal industry benchmarking platform drawn from firms' financial and time billing systems. Sixteen Australian firms with an average lawyer head count of 510 took part in the program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250