DWF Delays Salary Reviews Citing Economic Outlook
The development comes just days after the firm decided to shut its Singapore and Brussels offices, amid a sliding share price which on Thursday morning hit its lowest ever value.
July 02, 2020 at 04:17 AM
3 minute read
U.K. listed law firm DWF has postponed its firm-wide annual salary review until the end of the calendar year, as the firm's share price continues to slide, with the firm citing a need for better visibility of the current economic outlook.
The salary reviews typically take place in July, meaning this year's pay reviews will take place five months later than usual, according to two people with knowledge of the listed law firm.
The development comes just days after the firm announced sweeping new cost-cutting measures, including the closure of two offices in Singapore and Brussels, as well as staff cuts at the firm's Cologne and Dubai offices.
In total, 60 roles have been axed so far, including 13 partners.
It has been a testing few months for the main market-listed firm, which in May replaced its long-time chief executive Andrew Leaitherland with chairman Sir Nigel Knowles.
At the time of publication, the firm's share price was down nearly 5% to 46p – its lowest ever value, and down two-thirds on its pre-COVID market high of 143p. The firm floated on the London Stock Exchange's main market in March 2019.
In a statement on the latest measures, a DWF spokesperson said: "'DWF has deferred its annual pay review from July until December.
"This is to allow the pay review to be conducted at a time when there is greater certainty and visibility on the economic outlook."
DWF is not the only firm to have pushed back salary reviews. Others including Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance and Herbert Smith Freehills have suspended reviews citing coronavirus disruption.
In April, DWF also moved to extend its current arrangements with its bank with a secondary revolving credit facility of £15 million, in place for 18 month, in addition to its existing £80 million facility.
|
Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoctors and Scientists Lead Climate Protests at Each Magic Circle Firm
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250