Cultural Problems at Your Law Firm? These Women Might Have the Solution
A new legal consultancy is determined to tackle the industry's ongoing diversity problems.
July 09, 2020 at 05:54 AM
6 minute read
Leading law firms have been keen to speak out about the importance of diversity in recent months. Yet when it comes to improving diversity within their own workforces progress remains slow.
A recent survey of the U.K. top-tier legal industry found that only about 1% of lawyers at 39 of the largest firms are Black. Several firms refused to even provide numbers. Meanwhile several Black lawyers have recently painted woeful pictures of the realities they often face during their careers.
At the same time, many firms still have large gender pay gaps and there have been plenty of allegations of sexual misconduct among law's senior ranks.
So is there a fresh solution out there for firms who really do want to improve their standing?
Charlene Brown and Laura Durrant are two Black female lawyers who think they've got an answer, offering practical solutions to major institutions about the above issues and aiming to stop them from occurring in the first place.
The pair have joined forces at advisory firm Howlett Brown, launched by Brown and co-founder Alex Howlett as a 'people intelligence business', in 2019. The offering, which brought on former White & Case partner Durrant earlier this year, specialises in internal investigations as well as culture and people consulting solutions.
"What people aren't always doing is to deconstructing everything in society around them when they're trying to improve, and to us, that's the starting point," Durrant states.
"Society is biased and you need to teach people to recognise that bias. That's when a commitment to diversity becomes resilient."
This approach underpins the diversity training they offer, with Brown stating that the business has seen an uptick in interest on race issues in particular from clients, amid the global #BlackLivesMatter protests in recent weeks.
As well as training, Howlett Brown is called in by businesses to conduct internal investigations if something has gone awry.
Its clientele already includes around 10 of the AmLaw Global 100, and other major U.K. law firms and banks.
Internal Insights
Brown and Durrant both argue that their combined experience inside both types of business gives them an invaluable insight into the internal workings – and problems – often faced.
Brown spent over a decade focusing on employment law and investigations as an in-house lawyer at BNY Mellon and in private practice at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Morgan Lewis & Bockius.
She says the approach was fairly linear in those environments when issues arose for clients.
"We would get called in to resolve an issue that has got out of hand. But we would rarely look at the behaviours that occurred to cause that in the first place – what is accepted behaviour versus what is expected and how does it link to company values, for example.
"For businesses, any regulatory issue will usually trump any people issue. But when you over prioritise one and neglect the other, the employment piece becomes a greater problem," she explains.
As well as addressing issues such as racial and gender assumptions, Brown and Durrant are also keen to challenge the traditional way of thinking about law firm structures. The traditional partnership model, for example, has sometimes been criticized for being too reliant on an 'up or out' system and not supporting non-linear career paths, which could put working parents or anyone from a less-privileged background at a disadvantage.
Again, the pair feel like they have unique insight into the issue given both are mixed-race women whose fathers hailed from the Caribbean, and both grew up in Yorkshire, making them strident supporters of the need for more efforts to be made when it comes to social mobility in the law too.
"Social mobility is so important. There's a real excitement for both of us about working with someone who you can bounce ideas off and who is also constantly thinking about how we can hopefully move the agenda along," Durrant says.
Brown was introduced to Durrant when a mutual acquaintance flagged her departure from White & Case after just under 18 months at the firm.
Durrant had previously worked at RBS as head of litigation, regulatory and investigations at the bank, and as an associate at Herbert Smith Freehills.
"It's rare when you come across lawyers who also want to think more innovatively, and who think commercially about getting different, better outcomes for the industry," says Brown. "It's rare in the City to find someone who you can work with like that."
Peer Review Problems
The firm also offers investigation services. Durrant says that partnerships can often face challenges as management training, unlike at corporates, is sometimes lacking.
"Instead, you create siloes of teams that have individual people running things and nobody in ultimate charge," she says.
When it comes to any bad behavior by partners, questions have been raised in recent years about how effective internal investigations can truly be into misconduct, when they are headed up by the individual's peers and may be able to be influenced by the alleged perpetrator.
The pair say their knowledge of the internal workings of law firms lends itself to investigating them, and advising why sometimes an internal response may not be the best approach.
"There can be so many issues when a partner is appointed to investigate another. It's hard to understand if you haven't been in that sort of environment," Durrant says.
Brown adds Howlette Brown has had a lot of referrals from other law firms for long-standing clients, who are keen to be seen to use a separate offering instead of their usual adviser.
"Clients want to make sure they have the 'independence' badge on an investigation, and not be seen to be using their own law firm that could be accused of bias."
And it is bias in all forms that the duo is keen to stamp out via their approach to the issue.
"If someone is shut down, it can create a culture of fear that's counterproductive to understanding and changing their behaviour," Durrant says.
"Instead, it's about having conversations and educating people rather than letting people feel attacked and judged."
|Read More
Magic Circle Partnerships' Oxbridge and Private School Bias Exposed
Industry is 'Elitist' and 'a Bit of a Bubble', Say London Lawyers
'Complacent' law firm leaders accused of not calling out 'micro-aggressions'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Spies Reveal How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
5 minute read'Get Your House in Order' SFO Warns Corporates, as UK Government Issues Long-Awaited Fraud Guidance
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250