Latin America Deal Activity Falls to Record Low During Pandemic
Three global firms rose to the top of the Latin America rankings by deal value in Mergermarket's latest report, which also showed that first-half deal value hit its lowest level since the firm began tracking transactions in the region.
July 10, 2020 at 02:55 PM
4 minute read
Merger and acquisition activity in Latin America plunged to an all-time low during the first half of the year as the arrival of the new coronavirus stunted deal activity.
Just 199 deals worth $8.1 billion closed during the first six months of 2020, down from 316 deals worth $35 billion in the same period of 2019, according to data from Mergermarket. The 77% decline in deal value is the worst since the firm started tracking activity in the region in 2001.
"As the last region to be hit in late February with COVID-19, about a month after the first case in the U.S. was confirmed, Latin America still struggles to control the spread even as countries outside the region begin to reopen their economies," said Viviana Balan, research relationship manager for the Americas at Mergermarket.
As usual, law firms in Brazil—Latin America's largest economy—occupied the top-three spots for legal advisers in the Mergermarket league table by number of deals, albeit each with fewer deals than last year.
Brazil's Pinheiro Neto Advogados logged 23 deals worth $1 billion while Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados worked 16 transactions worth $1.7 billion and Demarest Advogados was involved in 11 deals worth $404 million.
Lex Mundi firm Brigard Urrutia, from Colombia, and global firm White & Case also made it into the top five by number of deals.
Normally, Brazilian firms would also lead rankings by deal value. However, Mergermarket said deal value from Brazil plunged 75% during the first half of 2020.
That sharp drop in deal flow propelled three global firms to the top of rankings by deal value. Debevoise & Plimpton clinched the top spot, having worked three deals worth $2.3 billion in the region. That's a steep climb versus the firm's rank of 80 in the region by deal value in the first half of 2019.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, which worked two deals worth $2.2 billion, came in second after having ranked 128 in Latin America last year. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher rose to third from 13 with a single deal worth 2.2 billion.
Mattos Filho and Brazil's Cescon, Barrieu, Flesch & Barreto Advogados rounded out the top-five firms by total deal value.
|Investment Largely on Hold
Mergermarket reported that foreign investors largely held back from the region, with Chinese investment plummeting 89% by deal value during the first half while interest from Japanese investors held steady. Domestic M&A nearly froze during the period. The consumer and agriculture sectors have proven most-resilient.
Looking ahead, Balan said the recovery of M&A activity in Latin America strongly depends on how countries in the region deal with COVID-19. Approaches to the health emergency have varied, with countries such as Chile closing borders and enforcing strict quarantines while the region's two biggest countries by population and economy—Brazil and Mexico—have mostly attempted to maintain business as usual.
"As Latin America was one of the last geographies to be hit by the pandemic, countries are still experiencing growth in case numbers," Balan said. "M&A activity in the region can be expected to remain low for the coming months."
Transactional Track Record, which tracks a broader base of transactions, reported that deals in the region declined 30% by number and 60% by combined value during the first half of the year. Transactional Track Record found 835 deals worth $20.6 billion.
Mauricio Borrero, a partner with Dentons Cardenas & Cardenas in Colombia who heads the firm's corporate practice group for Latin America and the Caribbean, told Transactional Track Record there are signs that "distressed" M&A transactions are on the rise in the region.
"Probably this will be one of the motors of the M&A market over the next 18-24 months," said Borrero, who predicted a return to "normalcy" in 2023.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250