Dechert to Pay ENRC £225K as it Agrees to Disclose More Documents
The long-running dispute has seen the law firm pay about £450,000 to the ENRC so far this year, people say.
July 13, 2020 at 05:48 AM
4 minute read
Dechert has agreed to pay the Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC) £225,000 after both sides reached an agreement regarding document disclosure on their long-running dispute last week.
A London Commercial Court hearing, which was meant to start on Thursday and end on Friday, did not take place as Dechert and its white-collar crime head Neil Gerrard agreed to search for and disclose documents the ENRC claims are relevant to its civil claim against the firm and Gerrard.
As part of that agreement, Dechert also said it would pay £225,000 of the ENRC's costs in relation to the ENRC's application for disclosure of documents, according to people close to the matter. Dechert itself had brought an application for disclosure against the ENRC in March but nine out of 11 claims were thrown out in Court.
In total, the firm has paid about £600,000 in costs to the ENRC this year on disclosure matters alone, one person said. The person added that the firm is likely to have spent about the same amount in legal fees.
However, the ENRC also paid about £200,000 in security for costs to the firm in March, according to another person close to the matter, who added the net amount the firm has paid to the ENRC was about £450,000
Adding together both its own legal fees and costs paid to Dechert, the ENRC has spent between £600,000 and £1.5 million, according to two people close to the matter.
The ENRC launched civil proceedings against Dechert and Gerrard claiming breaches of trust and fiduciary duties, reckless conduct, and the unauthorised disclosure of privileged and confidential information to the media and the SFO while advising the ENRC between 2011 and 2013. An eight-week trial is set to commence in the Commercial Court on June 8, 2021.
Last October, Dechert disclosed approximately 120,000 documents relating to the matter, but the ENRC applied for the disclosure of further documents, which the firm and Gerrard have now agreed to disclose by August.
The firm has now agreed to search for and disclose documents that the ENRC alleges were leaked to the Sunday Times by Neil Gerrard in 2011, and to provide copies of Dechert's job offer letter to Gerrard when he joined in 2011, as well as copies of his payslips and other financial reports.
Meanwhile, Gerrard agreed to have his own email and voicemail inboxes, and expense records searched for alleged evidence of his relationship with the Serious Fraud Office.
A spokesperson for the ENRC said in a statement: "This volte-face by Dechert and Neil Gerrard is a clear recognition that their objections to ENRC's requests were not credible and unlikely to stand up to scrutiny in court. It is remarkable for a reputable legal firm not to understand the basic principles of disclosure, and this setback should lead them to reflect on the extraordinary sums it is expending to defend Mr. Gerrard. We have consistently maintained that Dechert's only course of action should be to undertake a rigorous inquiry into Mr. Gerrard's actions."
A spokesperson for Dechert said: "We refute all the allegations being made against us. We have, and will continue to, comply with full disclosure requirements."
By the end of the case, total costs that Dechert and Gerrard spend in defending their claim against the ENRC could come in at around £40 million, court documents showed in April.
|Read More:
Dechert Partner Accused of Orchestrating a 'Secret Prison' in the Middle East
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1As Political Extremism Rises, is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
- 2So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 3US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 4From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 5Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250