Dechert to Pay ENRC £225K as it Agrees to Disclose More Documents
The long-running dispute has seen the law firm pay about £450,000 to the ENRC so far this year, people say.
July 13, 2020 at 05:48 AM
4 minute read
Dechert has agreed to pay the Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC) £225,000 after both sides reached an agreement regarding document disclosure on their long-running dispute last week.
A London Commercial Court hearing, which was meant to start on Thursday and end on Friday, did not take place as Dechert and its white-collar crime head Neil Gerrard agreed to search for and disclose documents the ENRC claims are relevant to its civil claim against the firm and Gerrard.
As part of that agreement, Dechert also said it would pay £225,000 of the ENRC's costs in relation to the ENRC's application for disclosure of documents, according to people close to the matter. Dechert itself had brought an application for disclosure against the ENRC in March but nine out of 11 claims were thrown out in Court.
In total, the firm has paid about £600,000 in costs to the ENRC this year on disclosure matters alone, one person said. The person added that the firm is likely to have spent about the same amount in legal fees.
However, the ENRC also paid about £200,000 in security for costs to the firm in March, according to another person close to the matter, who added the net amount the firm has paid to the ENRC was about £450,000
Adding together both its own legal fees and costs paid to Dechert, the ENRC has spent between £600,000 and £1.5 million, according to two people close to the matter.
The ENRC launched civil proceedings against Dechert and Gerrard claiming breaches of trust and fiduciary duties, reckless conduct, and the unauthorised disclosure of privileged and confidential information to the media and the SFO while advising the ENRC between 2011 and 2013. An eight-week trial is set to commence in the Commercial Court on June 8, 2021.
Last October, Dechert disclosed approximately 120,000 documents relating to the matter, but the ENRC applied for the disclosure of further documents, which the firm and Gerrard have now agreed to disclose by August.
The firm has now agreed to search for and disclose documents that the ENRC alleges were leaked to the Sunday Times by Neil Gerrard in 2011, and to provide copies of Dechert's job offer letter to Gerrard when he joined in 2011, as well as copies of his payslips and other financial reports.
Meanwhile, Gerrard agreed to have his own email and voicemail inboxes, and expense records searched for alleged evidence of his relationship with the Serious Fraud Office.
A spokesperson for the ENRC said in a statement: "This volte-face by Dechert and Neil Gerrard is a clear recognition that their objections to ENRC's requests were not credible and unlikely to stand up to scrutiny in court. It is remarkable for a reputable legal firm not to understand the basic principles of disclosure, and this setback should lead them to reflect on the extraordinary sums it is expending to defend Mr. Gerrard. We have consistently maintained that Dechert's only course of action should be to undertake a rigorous inquiry into Mr. Gerrard's actions."
A spokesperson for Dechert said: "We refute all the allegations being made against us. We have, and will continue to, comply with full disclosure requirements."
By the end of the case, total costs that Dechert and Gerrard spend in defending their claim against the ENRC could come in at around £40 million, court documents showed in April.
Read More:
Dechert Partner Accused of Orchestrating a 'Secret Prison' in the Middle East
SFO opens criminal probe into mining giant amid Dechert corruption claims
Dechert accused of leaking confidential information to The Sunday Times in long-running ENRC dispute
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJones Day, BCLP & Other Major Firms Boost European Teams with Key Partner Hires
4 minute read$13.8 Billion Magomedov Claim Thrown Out by UK High Court
Ropes & Gray, Mori Hamada, Nishimura & Asahi Act on Bain Capital’s $634M Aircraft Business Acquisition in Japan
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250