UC System Taps Crowell & Moring in ICE Student Visa Litigation
The University of California's legal team, which includes Crowell & Moring's Jennifer Romano and Emily Kuwahara, said the policy change is "cruel and dangerous," in the complaint filed July 10.
July 13, 2020 at 03:49 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The University of California system has enlisted Crowell & Moring in its suit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement over its new policy requiring international students to leave the United States if their coursework has become fully remote in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
The complaint filed July 10 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California follows a similar suit brought by Johns Hopkins University last week.
Crowell & Moring's Jennifer Romano and Emily Kuwahara and a team of lawyers from the University of California's Office of the General Counsel said ICE's rule change "displays a callous disregard for students."
"Under any circumstance, the manner and suddenness by which ICE announced and intends to implement its new policy would be shocking in a system that champions the rule of law and public input on agency rules before they are finalized," wrote the lawyers for the Regents of the University of California. "That the about-face comes against the backdrop of a worsening public health crisis in this country makes it not only unlawful, but cruel and dangerous."
The university system announced that it planned to sue the agencies Wednesday. In a statement, UC board of regents Chair John Pérez said that the university's legacy and leadership would not be the same without international students.
"Even last-ditch efforts can cause real harm, so it is imperative for UC to file this lawsuit in order to protect our students," he said. "To UC's international students, I say: 'We support you and regret the additional chaos ICE's action has caused.' To the courts, I say, 'We are the University of California. UC knows science, UC knows law, and we approach both in good faith. Our opponents have shown you time and again that they do not.'"
Johns Hopkins brought a similar suit July 10, backed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. Both suits are seeking court orders vacating and setting aside the policy and reinstating ICE's prior guidance issued March 13, the day President Donald Trump declared the COVID-19 pandemic a national emergency, which provided an exemption to a rule requiring F-1 student visa holders to attend most classes in person.
On Monday, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher filed a complaint on behalf of a coalition of 20 West Coast colleges and universities, including the University of Southern California, University of Oregon, Stanford University and California Institute of Technology.
The institutions of higher learning "refuse to tolerate ICE's unwarranted and unlawful action that threatens to disrupt the education of hundreds of thousands of hardworking students and their academic environments and missions," according to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.
The Gibson Dunn attorneys also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The coalition is asking the court to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that stays the effectiveness of the policy, given that the rule asks students to submit operational plans by Wednesday and revised plans by Aug. 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readIsraeli Firm Pearl Cohen Combines with San Francisco IP Boutique
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250