Firms Delay Melbourne Office Reopen Plans After Coronavirus Spike
Global and Australian firms are putting the brakes on return-to-office plans as the State of Victoria saw the largest COVID resurgence in months.
July 14, 2020 at 07:40 AM
5 minute read
Local and international law firms have pushed back their plans to reopen their Melbourne offices as the southern Australian city battles a resurgence of COVID-19 virus.
Firms including Norton Rose Fulbright, Clayton Utz and MinterEllison had planned to start slowly allowing staff in their Melbourne offices to return to the workplace this month but are now taking a more cautious approach.
"We were originally looking at around July 6 to begin the first stage of our return to office plan," said Paul James, partner in charge of Melborne office with Clayton Utz, a leading local firm. "We've obviously had to put those plans on hold in light of recent developments."
The state of Victoria, of which Melbourne is the capital, has suffered a sharp spike in coronavirus cases from the end of June after security guards were believed to have contracted the virus from quarantined returned travelers and spread it through the community. Some 270 new cases were detected in Victoria on Monday, with 1,523 coming in the past 7 days. Before that, the state's new infections had dropped to below 10 on many days in April and June before rising sharply.
Clayton Utz's Melbourne office has remained open for essential business, but Melbourne partners and employees are being asked to continue working remotely.
"We were looking forward to starting to welcome people back into the office. Clearly it's a very frustrating and anxious time again for many people, and we're looking to support our Melbourne team in the best way we can," James said.
Norton Rose Fulbright last month moved to new Melbourne premises, which have so far remained largely unoccupied.
"We had planned to see more of our people return to the office in Melbourne this month to experience our new building at Olderfleet, 477 Collins Street. This would have aligned with our other Australian offices, where people have been gradually returning throughout July and up to 50% have been in the office on any given day," said firm Australia managing partner Alison Deitz, who's based in Sydney.
"The worsening COVID-19 situation in the city of Melbourne in particular required us to delay those plans for the time being," she said.
Before the spike local firm MinterEllison had started on the first steps of reopening its Melbourne office, moving to what it calls Phase 2, where fewer than 20% of its staff can be in the office at the same time.
It has now moved back to Phase 1, where only business critical staff are on the premises.
The surge in new COVID-19 cases in Melbourne has taken Australia's total number of confirmed coronavirus cases to 10,250 with 108 deaths. The nation's peak in daily new cases came at the end of March, with only a handful of daily new cases reported through most of May and June until the Melbourne resurgence.
Even before the new outbreaks in Melbourne, the Victorian government had been more cautious about relaxing social distancing laws, asking people to continue working from home if they could, while other states opened up more quickly.
Like other businesses, law firms have restaffed their offices more quickly in other major cities.
Local firm Gilbert + Tobin's Perth office is "effectively fully open," while in Sydney staff can choose either to work at home or in the office. "Our people are making that choice day-by-day based on what suits their work best. On any given day we are probably at 40-50% of normal capacity," the firm said.
Staff at the Sydney, Brisbane and Perth offices of DLA Piper are transitioning back to work for a few days a week and will continue to work from home for the rest of the week for the foreseeable future. Melbourne staff will continue to work from home.
At Baker McKenzie, staff in Sydney and Brisbane have been working from the offices on a voluntary basis.
A spokesman for Corrs Chambers Westgarth said the firm's remote working arrangements "have proven to be very effective and we have been taking a conservative approach to the use of our offices".
"While all our offices remain open, our people in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane are continuing to work remotely, with only a small team of people in each office performing essential on-site services. At this point we have no plans to alter this position," the firm said.
|Related Stories:
Law Firms in Australia Begin Opening Offices, but Remote Working May Win Out
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250