CMS Enforces Rota System for UK Office Returns
Two groups will take it in turns to come into the office following a survey by the firm.
July 17, 2020 at 06:47 AM
2 minute read
CMS has implemented a rota system for staff wishing to return to the firm's London, Manchester and Sheffield offices, whereby groups of staff alternate which week they can be in the office.
The firm has also implemented a number of health precuations for the offices including sanitisers stations, one-way systems and deep cleans, the firm confirmed.
The office return follows a survey of staff undertaken by the firm, where those indicating they were happy to return to the office were allocated to one of two groups, according to a CMS partner.
The two groups take it in turns to be in the office during the week, while any person wishing to go into the office when it's not their turn to do so must get permission from the CMS management, the partner added.
A spokesperson for the firm said: "We have robust measures in place to protect our people and others from the risk of infection which remains our highest priority."
"In compliance with the guidance set by the UK Government and the Health & Safety Executive, we have undertaken a COVID-19 risk assessment to ensure our workplaces and operations are COVID-secure."
The firm has also introduced a number of health precautions for returning staff including one-way systems and sanitiser stations as well as prohibiting visitors and clients from entering the building except in exceptional circumstances, according to a firm spokesperson.
The offices will be deep cleaned each weekend, and all staff returning to the office have been asked to self-monitor symptoms before leaving home, they added.
CMS is the latest firm to have commenced a phased return to the office, following Ashurst and Taylor Wessing this month.
Other top firms including Linklaters, Allen & Overy and Slaughter and May have also started letting small numbers of staff back into their London headquarters.
|Read More
Hogan Lovells Set To 'Fully Reopen' Paris Office, Encouraging Staff to Return
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
- 2'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 3LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 4'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 5Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250