Pinsents Scraps Quarterly Partner Distributions After Third Delay in Nine Months
The firm has also decided to pay out its previous quarterly distribution in three installments.
July 20, 2020 at 04:42 AM
3 minute read
Pinsent Masons has scrapped paying out quarterly profit distributions to partners after having delayed payments three times in the last nine months.
The latest installment was supposed to happen at the end of June, but partners found out it was delayed a day before the deadline, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
Asked about the change, senior partner Richard Foley said in a statement that financial prudence was a "guiding principle" of the firm. He added: "With this in mind, a few months ago we moved away from the old/traditional practice of quarterly distributions of undrawn profit from prior years.
"We will monitor economic conditions and make decisions about the distribution of undrawn profits as and when it's appropriate to do so."
The new measures apply to all partners both in the U.K. and internationally.
The firm also confirmed that it is set to pay out delayed profit distributions from March over three monthly instalments, rather than with the usual lump sum. The first of these smaller installments is expected at the end of July, they said.
Foley added that monthly payments on account of current year drawings will be paid on time and as usual.
He added: "It's fair and appropriate that partners continue to shoulder the principle burden of the economic consequences of CV-19 and the cashflow pressures this creates so, as would be expected, distributions to partners have been and will continue to be reduced and delayed for some time."
Pinsents first delayed its partner distributions in Autumn last year. At the time, one person said that this was due to the firm failing to hit billing and cash collection targets.
The firm meanwhile said in October that the move was "not an unusual step in the context of our firm and is something we have done a number of times in previous years."
Pinsents later paid out its next distribution in December in full, along with half the sum owed from the previous quarter, two people with knowledge of the situation said.
Following the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, the firm then announced that it would defer its usual March distributions, as well as implement other financial measures including furloughing of non-legal staff.
Later in the same month, the firm implemented a reduced hours and pay scheme, whereby staff in certain parts of the business saw hours cut by 20%, while salary reductions are taking place on a "sliding scale".
Various other top law firms have deferred partner distributions, with the measure being one of the favoured approached by top U.K. firms in light of the pandemic.
Others to have taken the step include Allen & Overy, Linklaters and CMS.
|Read More
BCLP To Cut 40 In London, Keep Global Pay Trim and Close Beijing Base
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoctors and Scientists Lead Climate Protests at Each Magic Circle Firm
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250