How Have In-House Teams Adapted to the Crisis?
Winston & Strawn partner Ben Bruton has seen a number of trends from general counsel clients.
July 21, 2020 at 03:13 AM
4 minute read
A crisis like COVID-19 presents a highly unusual set of challenges for global business. Whilst, for any business, ensuring the immediate health and safety of its workforce is paramount, a coordinated and considered crisis response strategy is also essential.
Since the World Health Organisation declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020, its effects have been felt across almost every sector. In many organisations, the in-house legal function has been placed under unprecedented pressure as their businesses have sought guidance on a whole range of legal issues and short to long term risk mitigation strategies.
Based on our discussions with our general counsel clients since governments across the world imposed varying lockdown obligations, and also from the type of activity we are seeing from our perspective as a legal services business, a number of trends are emerging.
From a logistical perspective, in-house teams appear to have adapted to the new way of working extremely well. For many years, in-house functions have been challenged to "do more with less" and, therefore, remote management of teams, video-conferencing and effective communication across jurisdictions have become well entrenched as working practices.
There has also been a real focus on checking in on colleagues and supporting each other, recognising that the individual circumstances of remote working, and the challenges it may bring, will vary significantly and, unless actively inquired about, many of those challenges may go unnoticed by team leaders.
Many of the general counsel we have spoken to have also guided their businesses through the 2008 financial crisis. Similar to 2008, the pandemic has caused financial instability and market upset which has led to defaults in a variety of contractual and payment obligations and, in some cases, litigation.
However, the 2008 financial crisis was triggered by illiquidity and deficiencies in the global financial system itself and, whilst some of the effects will be similar from a litigation trends perspective, the causes and the nature of the pandemic are so different to the 2008 financial crisis that comparisons have limited utility.
There is also a sense that the volume and nature of litigation and arbitration cases arising from the pandemic will be affected significantly by the approach that the courts in major common law jurisdictions adopt to the claims which develop. In view of the serious humanitarian aspects of the pandemic, in cases where there is scope for judicial discretion, the courts are likely to be particularly intolerant of opportunism on the part of claimants.
Third party litigation funding had become a well-established feature of the dispute resolution landscape well before the pandemic. However, interest in third party funding within the general counsel community has certainly increased since the onset of the pandemic as businesses exercise caution around protecting their balance sheets.
Similarly, the funds available for deployment are now substantial. With interest rates at sustained record low levels, litigation funding has become an attractive investment class, even to conservative institutional investors.
A particularly uplifting trend emerging is the emphasis that businesses have been placing on proactive, constructive engagement with contractual counterparties, sometimes going well beyond the requirements of contractual obligations to protect the integrity of supply chains.
Whilst this approach is often preferable to adversarial litigation, experienced general counsel also tend to be able to identify the disagreements that have the potential to develop into formal disputes and are preparing proactively by taking steps to strengthen their platform from which to subsequently litigate successfully. This is one of the key areas in which we have also been advising recently.
It is clear that in-house teams across all sectors are under significant pressure. However, it is also clear from the insights we receive that the value of the contribution in-house counsel make, as perceived by their businesses, also appears to be at an unprecedented high.
Ben Bruton is a dispute resolution and investigations partner at Winston & Strawn.
Read More:
BT's Litigation Head on How This Crisis Differs from 2008 and What External Advisers Should be Doing
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPallas Partners Founder On the Disputes Trends to Look Out For in 2025
4 minute readWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cybersecurity Breaches, Cyberbullying, and Ways to Help Protect Clients From Both
- 2AI in 2025: Five Key Predictions on How It Will Reshape International Law Firms
- 3Justice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
- 4Robinson & Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel
- 5'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250