Slack Accuses Microsoft of Anti-Competitive Practices, Files EU Complaint
Slack has accused its main rival Microsoft of illegal, anti-competitive behavior and asked the European Commission to intervene as a "neutral referee".
July 23, 2020 at 08:10 AM
3 minute read
Slack, the company behind the popular messaging platform of the same name, on Wednesday filed a competition complaint before the European Commission against its main rival, Microsoft.
The San Francisco-based company alleges that Microsoft abused its market dominance by bundling two of its products, making it impossible for millions of customers to use its popular "office productivity suite" – which includes Word, PowerPoint, Excel and Outlook – without also installing its "Microsoft Teams" collaboration software. Microsoft Teams is similar to Slack's widely used channel-based messaging platform.
Slack has turned to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's antitrust team to advise it through the process, according to people close to the matter.
According to a statement by Slack, Microsoft is trying to use its dominance in one market to gain a foothold in another market – a practice the company described as illegal and anti-competitive.
"We're confident that we win on the merits of our product, but we can't ignore illegal behavior that deprives customers of access to the tools and solutions they want," Jonathan Prince, vice-president of communications and policy at Slack, said in a statement published on the company's website.
"Competition and antitrust laws are designed to ensure that dominant companies are not allowed to foreclose competition illegally. We're asking the EU to be a neutral referee, examine the facts, and enforce the law," he added.
The European Commission will review Slack's complaint – which will not be made public under the Commission's rules – and decide whether to open an investigation in the coming months. There is no legal deadline to investigate competition complaints. Their duration depends on a number of factors, including the complexity of the case and the extent to which the companies concerned co-operate with the Commission.
Slack's prod to European officials to scrutinize the practices of its rival comes just as the bloc's executive arm has itself suffered major losses in disputes with two U.S. tech giants.
Last week, the European Court of Justice quashed a state aid decision by the Commission ordering the U.S. tech giant Apple to pay back €13.1 billion in unpaid taxes. One day later, the Luxembourg-based court also ruled that the U.S.-EU data protection agreement known as "Privacy Shield" did not meet GPDR standards, essentially ordering the Commission to work out a new deal with U.S. authorities.
Microsoft, based in Redmond, Washington, responded in a statement that its service differs from that offered by Slack.
"We created Teams to combine the ability to collaborate with the ability to connect via video, because that's what people want. With COVID-19, the market has embraced Teams in record numbers while Slack suffered from its absence of video-conferencing," the company said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe SLAPP Heard Around the World: SDT Hearing Draws Industry Attention
5 minute readCMS Wistrand Hires Former Linklaters Nordics MP and Bird & Bird's Danish Hire
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Florida Pursues New Charge Against Trump Assassination Suspect
- 2Telefónica Maintains State Court Win in $623M Failed Merger Dispute
- 3‘Badge of Honor’: SEC Targets CyberKongz in Token Registration Dispute
- 45 Longtime Broward County Judges Set to Retire by End of 2024
- 5Top Five Florida Settlements of 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250