Plaintiffs Firm Launches Australia's First COVID-19 Class Action Against Cruise Ship Operator
Shine Lawyers is suing the operator of the Ruby Princess cruise liner over an outbreak of 700 COVID-19 cases including 21 deaths.
July 27, 2020 at 05:15 AM
2 minute read
Australian plaintiffs law firm Shine Lawyers is suing the operator of the Ruby Princess cruise liner over the outbreak of COVID-19 on the ship in the country's first class action related to the pandemic.
Around 700 novel coronavirus cases and 21 deaths have been linked to the Ruby Princess cruise, which docked in Sydney on March 19, said Vicky Antzoulatos, class actions practice leader at Shine Lawyers.
The firm is seeking compensation through the Federal Court of Australia on behalf of passengers, their families, and the estates of those who died.
All 2,700 passengers who traveled on the Ruby Princess voyage which departed from Sydney on March 8 are eligible to join the class action, as are relatives who have suffered a psychiatric injury as a result of the events that occurred, Antzoulatos said.
The class action alleges Anglo-American cruise operator Carnival Plc. and subsidiary Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. breached the Australian Consumer Law requirement to carry out services with due care and to carry out services which are fit for their intended purpose.
"We say that Carnival and Princess Cruises knew of certain facts and risks, such as the fact that there are 158 people with corona-like symptoms on the previous cruise and it didn't disclose those matters to the incoming passengers and the failure to warn of the risks was misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law," she said.
So far the firm has had about 800 inquiries, she said.
The action is Australia's first coronavirus-related class action, Antzoulatos said, but added the firm is also investigating a class action in relation to an outbreak of the virus at the Newmarch House aged care home, where an outbreak in April caused 19 deaths.
The NSW government is holding a Special Commission of Inquiry into how the Ruby Princess outbreak became one of Australia's largest sources of novel coronavirus.
Princess Cruise Lines has not responded to a request for comment.
|Related Stories:
Business Groups Move for COVID-19 Lawsuit Protections Even as Grievances Stack Up
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250