Plaintiffs Firm Launches Australia's First COVID-19 Class Action Against Cruise Ship Operator
Shine Lawyers is suing the operator of the Ruby Princess cruise liner over an outbreak of 700 COVID-19 cases including 21 deaths.
July 27, 2020 at 05:15 AM
2 minute read
Australian plaintiffs law firm Shine Lawyers is suing the operator of the Ruby Princess cruise liner over the outbreak of COVID-19 on the ship in the country's first class action related to the pandemic.
Around 700 novel coronavirus cases and 21 deaths have been linked to the Ruby Princess cruise, which docked in Sydney on March 19, said Vicky Antzoulatos, class actions practice leader at Shine Lawyers.
The firm is seeking compensation through the Federal Court of Australia on behalf of passengers, their families, and the estates of those who died.
All 2,700 passengers who traveled on the Ruby Princess voyage which departed from Sydney on March 8 are eligible to join the class action, as are relatives who have suffered a psychiatric injury as a result of the events that occurred, Antzoulatos said.
The class action alleges Anglo-American cruise operator Carnival Plc. and subsidiary Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. breached the Australian Consumer Law requirement to carry out services with due care and to carry out services which are fit for their intended purpose.
"We say that Carnival and Princess Cruises knew of certain facts and risks, such as the fact that there are 158 people with corona-like symptoms on the previous cruise and it didn't disclose those matters to the incoming passengers and the failure to warn of the risks was misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law," she said.
So far the firm has had about 800 inquiries, she said.
The action is Australia's first coronavirus-related class action, Antzoulatos said, but added the firm is also investigating a class action in relation to an outbreak of the virus at the Newmarch House aged care home, where an outbreak in April caused 19 deaths.
The NSW government is holding a Special Commission of Inquiry into how the Ruby Princess outbreak became one of Australia's largest sources of novel coronavirus.
Princess Cruise Lines has not responded to a request for comment.
Related Stories:
Business Groups Move for COVID-19 Lawsuit Protections Even as Grievances Stack Up
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Malaysia’s Shearn Delamore Set To Expand Local Footprint With New Office Launch
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
